Powered By Blogger

2021-08-31

Fwd: Xi Is Forgetting the Very Thing That Made China Great Again - Of course no, he's not forgetting. He and his party intentionally steal the credit and brainwash people, and take the credit to support his dictatorial regime's legitimacy.


Politics & Policy

Xi Is Forgetting the Very Thing That Made China Great Again

(Of course no, he's not forgetting. He and his party intentionally steal the credit and brainwash people, and take the credit to support his dictatorial regime's legitimacy.)

The economy only began to excel when the party's cadres released their grip from the nation's throat. Beijing should not take a backward step now.

1000x-1.jpg

August 31, 2021, 6:00 AM GMT+8

2021-08-30T22:00:17.602Z
Michael Schuman

Xi's Forgetting What Made China Great Again, as Tencent, Pinduoduo Kowtow

As any unfortunate investor in Chinese stocks already knows, the state is striking back. Perhaps the leaders of the Communist Party believe they are righting wrongs and solving problems. But their new intrusions also betray a bit of amnesia. They seem to have forgotten what really made China great again — not the state, but its absence. Until party boss Xi Jinping remembers that, he's putting the economy's future at risk.

The recent regulatory crackdown that's so roiled markets is typical of Xi's economic vision. The Chinese economy certainly needs smarter, more consistent regulation. But whether directed at data security or education, the incoming rules have taken on an anti-capitalist edge, replete with vague and threatening pronouncements and attacks that appear aimed at specific businesses that give off a whiff of impending, arbitrary punishment.

More from
Take, for instance, one of Xi's latest targets — income inequality. It's a worthy cause, especially since the gap between rich and poor in China has been rapidly widening. If Beijing intends to tackle it through heftier welfare and tax systems, the economy could benefit. But the campaign's early rhetoric should make big earners nervous. The Communist Party pledged to "adjust excessive income" — however that's defined. State media has tried to assuage fears the government would start "robbing the rich," but the well-heeled are already scrambling to kowtow. Online retailer Pinduoduo Inc. recently announced it would donate its first profit as a publicly listed company to rural development — money probably better spent investing in its own business. Similarly, tech giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. recently doubled its pledged funds for social programs to $15 billion.

More worrisome, however, is that this regulatory drive is part of a much wider trend toward even bigger government. We can see signs of that just about everywhere, from the heavy reliance on state-led industrial policies to propel new industries to Beijing's smothering of cryptocurrencies. Gaining more control over private enterprise is official policy. Last year, the Communist Party produced an "opinion" that its cadres should "guide" the private sector to create "a modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics."

To some, this may look like business as usual. In China's state capitalist system, the bureaucrats never stopped meddling with markets. Yet the new measures are also indicative of Xi's thinking about China's economic rise, and the party's role in it. In a 2018 speech commemorating the launch of China's liberalizing reforms, Xi said the program "has shown that Party leadership is the most essential attribute of socialism with Chinese characteristics and is the greatest strength of this system."

He continues to hammer that message. In his speech on the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party's founding in July, Xi did acknowledge the contribution of "the Chinese people" to the nation's economic achievements, but never used the words "entrepreneurship" or even "business." Instead, he said that "without the Communist Party of China, there would be no new China and no national rejuvenation."

Like any politician, Xi here is claiming credit for good news, hoping it burnishes his stature. Yet it's also fundamentally wrong. Sure, the government's strong stewardship of the economy over the past 40 years is undeniable. But so is the fact that the economy only began to excel when the party's cadres released their grip from the nation's throat. China's economic miracle was not a triumph of state action, but its withdrawal, starting when Deng Xiaoping dismantled the communes and prohibitions on private enterprise in the 1980s. That freed the ample entrepreneurial energies of Chinese farmers, workers and businesspeople, who responded with an explosion of individual initiative that propelled growth and wealth.

The scary part of Xi's program is the return of a cadres-know-best mentality. Recall what China became when the Communist Party was really running the show — isolated, technologically archaic and abysmally poor. Of course, Xi isn't about to take China into another Great Leap Forward. But his notion that he and his comrades can outthink both investors and the market is sending the wrong signals to the Chinese public, at the very moment in the country's development when their entrepreneurial genius is most needed. Starting a company is already a risky endeavor — why take the chance if it might get you into hot water with Xi?

Opinion. Data. More Data.Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.

We may already be seeing the negative effects. One recent survey revealed that more than 42% of college graduates preferred jobs at state-owned enterprises — a six percentage point increase from a year earlier — while those favoring the private sector declined to a mere 19%. That means China's best talent is flowing to its most inefficient companies and away from its more productive and innovative ones.

That should be heartening news only to China's economic competitors. Xi's program holds out the prospect that the party's hands are again tightening around China's neck. Xi needs to realize his people, not his party, transformed China. Until he does, stock investors won't be the only ones gasping for air.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Michael Schuman at contactschuman@gmail.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Ruth Pollard at rpollard2@bloomberg.net
Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Michael Schuman is author of "Superpower Interrupted: The Chinese History of the World" and "The Miracle: The Epic Story of Asia's Quest for Wealth." He has previously written for TIME, the Wall Street Journal and several other publications.
Read more opinionFollow @michaelschuman on Twitter

Xi Is Forgetting the Very Thing That Made China Great Again - Of course no, he's not forgetting. He and his party intentionally steal the credit and brainwash people, and take the credit to support his dictatorial regime's legitimacy.



Politics & Policy

Xi Is Forgetting the Very Thing That Made China Great Again

(Of course no, he's not forgetting. He and his party intentionally steal the credit and brainwash people, and take the credit to support his dictatorial regime's legitimacy.)

The economy only began to excel when the party's cadres released their grip from the nation's throat. Beijing should not take a backward step now.


2021-08-30T22:00:17.602Z
Michael Schuman

Xi's Forgetting What Made China Great Again, as Tencent, Pinduoduo Kowtow

As any unfortunate investor in Chinese stocks already knows, the state is striking back. Perhaps the leaders of the Communist Party believe they are righting wrongs and solving problems. But their new intrusions also betray a bit of amnesia. They seem to have forgotten what really made China great again — not the state, but its absence. Until party boss Xi Jinping remembers that, he's putting the economy's future at risk.

The recent regulatory crackdown that's so roiled markets is typical of Xi's economic vision. The Chinese economy certainly needs smarter, more consistent regulation. But whether directed at data security or education, the incoming rules have taken on an anti-capitalist edge, replete with vague and threatening pronouncements and attacks that appear aimed at specific businesses that give off a whiff of impending, arbitrary punishment.

Take, for instance, one of Xi's latest targets — income inequality. It's a worthy cause, especially since the gap between rich and poor in China has been rapidly widening. If Beijing intends to tackle it through heftier welfare and tax systems, the economy could benefit. But the campaign's early rhetoric should make big earners nervous. The Communist Party pledged to "adjust excessive income" — however that's defined. State media has tried to assuage fears the government would start "robbing the rich," but the well-heeled are already scrambling to kowtow. Online retailer Pinduoduo Inc. recently announced it would donate its first profit as a publicly listed company to rural development — money probably better spent investing in its own business. Similarly, tech giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. recently doubled its pledged funds for social programs to $15 billion.

More worrisome, however, is that this regulatory drive is part of a much wider trend toward even bigger government. We can see signs of that just about everywhere, from the heavy reliance on state-led industrial policies to propel new industries to Beijing's smothering of cryptocurrencies. Gaining more control over private enterprise is official policy. Last year, the Communist Party produced an "opinion" that its cadres should "guide" the private sector to create "a modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics."

To some, this may look like business as usual. In China's state capitalist system, the bureaucrats never stopped meddling with markets. Yet the new measures are also indicative of Xi's thinking about China's economic rise, and the party's role in it. In a 2018 speech commemorating the launch of China's liberalizing reforms, Xi said the program "has shown that Party leadership is the most essential attribute of socialism with Chinese characteristics and is the greatest strength of this system."

He continues to hammer that message. In his speech on the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party's founding in July, Xi did acknowledge the contribution of "the Chinese people" to the nation's economic achievements, but never used the words "entrepreneurship" or even "business." Instead, he said that "without the Communist Party of China, there would be no new China and no national rejuvenation."

Like any politician, Xi here is claiming credit for good news, hoping it burnishes his stature. Yet it's also fundamentally wrong. Sure, the government's strong stewardship of the economy over the past 40 years is undeniable. But so is the fact that the economy only began to excel when the party's cadres released their grip from the nation's throat. China's economic miracle was not a triumph of state action, but its withdrawal, starting when Deng Xiaoping dismantled the communes and prohibitions on private enterprise in the 1980s. That freed the ample entrepreneurial energies of Chinese farmers, workers and businesspeople, who responded with an explosion of individual initiative that propelled growth and wealth.

The scary part of Xi's program is the return of a cadres-know-best mentality. Recall what China became when the Communist Party was really running the show — isolated, technologically archaic and abysmally poor. Of course, Xi isn't about to take China into another Great Leap Forward. But his notion that he and his comrades can outthink both investors and the market is sending the wrong signals to the Chinese public, at the very moment in the country's development when their entrepreneurial genius is most needed. Starting a company is already a risky endeavor — why take the chance if it might get you into hot water with Xi?

Opinion. Data. More Data.Get the most important Bloomberg Opinion pieces in one email.

We may already be seeing the negative effects. One recent survey revealed that more than 42% of college graduates preferred jobs at state-owned enterprises — a six percentage point increase from a year earlier — while those favoring the private sector declined to a mere 19%. That means China's best talent is flowing to its most inefficient companies and away from its more productive and innovative ones.

That should be heartening news only to China's economic competitors. Xi's program holds out the prospect that the party's hands are again tightening around China's neck. Xi needs to realize his people, not his party, transformed China. Until he does, stock investors won't be the only ones gasping for air.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:
Michael Schuman at contactschuman@gmail.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Ruth Pollard at rpollard2@bloomberg.net

FT.com - George Soros: Investors in Xi’s China face a rude awakening



2021-08-30T12:58:08.044Z
George Soros

George Soros: Investors in Xi's China face a rude awakening

d0d279f2-63cf-4cbc-829b-5b5132f6202a.webp

The writer is chair and founder of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Foundations

Xi Jinping, China's leader, has collided with economic reality. His crackdown on private enterprise has been a significant drag on the economy. The most vulnerable sector is real estate, particularly housing. China has enjoyed an extended property boom over the past two decades, but that is now coming to an end. Evergrande, the largest real estate company, is over-indebted and in danger of default. This could cause a crash.

The underlying cause is that China's birth rate is much lower than the statistics indicate. The officially reported figure overstates the population by a significant amount. Xi inherited these demographics, but his attempts to change them have made matters worse.

One of the reasons why middle-class families are unwilling to have more than one child is that they want to make sure that their children will have a bright future. As a result, a large tutoring industry has grown up, dominated by Chinese companies backed by US investors. Such for-profit tutoring companies were recently banned from China and this became an important element in the sell-off in New York-listed Chinese companies and shell companies.

The crackdown by the Chinese government is real. Unnoticed by the financial markets, the Chinese government quietly took a stake and a board seat in TikTok owner ByteDance in April. The move gives Beijing one seat on a three-person board of directors and first-hand access to the inner workings of a company that has one of the world's largest troves of personal data. The market is more aware that the Chinese government is taking influential stakes in Alibaba and its subsidiaries.

Xi does not understand how markets operate. As a consequence, the sell-off was allowed to go too far. It began to hurt China's objectives in the world. Recognising this, Chinese financial authorities have gone out of their way to reassure foreign investors and markets have responded with a powerful rally. But that is a deception. Xi regards all Chinese companies as instruments of a one-party state. Investors buying into the rally are facing a rude awakening. That includes not only those investors who are conscious of what they are doing, but also a much larger number of people who have exposure via pension funds and other retirement savings.

Pension fund managers allocate their assets in ways that are closely aligned with the benchmarks against which their performance is measured. Almost all of them claim that they factor environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) standards into their investment decisions.

The MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI) is the benchmark most widely followed by global equity asset allocators. An estimated $5tn is passively managed, which means that it replicates the index. A multiple of this amount is actively managed, but it also closely tracks the MSCI index.

In MSCI's ACWI ESG Leaders Index, Alibaba and Tencent are two of the top 10 constituents. In BlackRock's ESG Aware emerging market exchange-traded fund, Chinese companies represent a third of total investments. These indices have effectively forced hundreds of billions of dollars belonging to US investors into Chinese companies whose corporate governance does not meet the required standard — power and accountability is now exercised by one man who is not accountable to any international authority.

The US Congress should pass a bipartisan bill explicitly requiring that asset managers invest only in companies where actual governance structures are both transparent and aligned with stakeholders. This rule should obviously apply to the performance benchmarks selected by pensions and other retirement portfolios.

If Congress were to enact these measures, it would give the Securities and Exchange Commission the tools it needs to protect American investors, including those who are unaware of owning Chinese stocks and Chinese shell companies. That would also serve the interests of the US and the wider international community of democracies.

SEC chair Gary Gensler has repeatedly warned the public of the risks they take by investing in China. But foreign investors who choose to invest in China find it remarkably difficult to recognise these risks. They have seen China confront many difficulties and always come through with flying colours. But Xi's China is not the China they know. He is putting in place an updated version of Mao Zedong's party. No investor has any experience of that China because there were no stock markets in Mao's time. Hence the rude awakening that awaits them.

2021-08-29

李承鵬:再說「今天……明天」,我就懷疑你在看毛片自擼

李承鵬:再說「今天……明天」,我就懷疑你在看毛片自擼



2021-08-27

Mass Arrest of Tibetans in Sichuan Over Dalai Lama Photos


Chinese police in Sichuan arrest nearly 60 Tibetan monks and laypeople found in possession of photos of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, whose images are banned in areas under Chinese control.

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/tibet/photos-08262021150651.html

Mass Arrest of Tibetans in Sichuan Over Dalai Lama Photos

The Dalai Lama fled Tibet into exile in 1959 amid a failed Tibetan uprising against rule by China, which had annexed the formerly independent Himalayan country by force.

2021-08-26

fe581154-2e38-4e42-b9e9-2c83be1f7133.png


Police in western China's Sichuan province arrested about 60 Tibetans found with photos of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama this week, intensifying a campaign against possession of the banned images, Tibetan sources say.

Taken into custody in Sunday's raid in Dza Wonpo township in the Kardze (in Chinese, Ganzi) Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture were 19 monks from a local monastery and 40 laypeople whose homes were thoroughly searched by police, a Tibetan living in India told RFA.

"Those who were arrested are currently being held at the Sershul [Shiqu] county police station," RFA's source said, speaking on condition of anonymity and citing contacts in the region.

Chinese police then called a meeting on Wednesday, three days later, telling local residents aged 18 and above they would penalized for failure to attend, the source said, adding, "The focus of the meeting was to warn people not to keep any pictures of the Dalai Lama or to share any information over their cell phones."

A second raid of houses in the township to find banned photos was then launched that same day, the source said.

This week's meeting and raids followed meetings earlier this year in Dza Wonpo in which Tibetans were forced to sign a document pledging not to keep or circulate photos of the Dalai Lama on penalty of criminal prosecution and cut-offs of state aid, according to Tibetan sources.

Authorities also inspected a local old-age home on the pretext of cleaning the facility and confiscated a number of the banned photos, giving facility residents pictures of China's president Xi Jinping and other Chinese leaders to put up in their place, one source said.
Already tightly restricted following widespread protests in Tibetan regions in 2008, Dza Wonpo's local monastery drew increased police attention in 2012 when monks refused to host Chinese national flags on the monastery's roofs.

Sporadic protests including the scattering of leaflets calling for Tibetan independence have continued in Dza Wonpo since then, with a monk named Tenzin Nyima, also called Tamey, dying in January of injuries sustained from beatings and torture in a Chinese prison after being released in a comatose state by

Considered a separatist by Chinese leaders, the Dalai Lama fled Tibet into exile in India in the midst of a failed 1959 national uprising against rule by China, which marched into the formerly independent Himalayan country and annexed it by force in 1950.

Chinese authorities maintain a tight grip on the region, restricting Tibetans' political activities and peaceful expression of cultural and religious identity, and subjecting Tibetans to persecution, torture, imprisonment, and extrajudicial killings.

Reported by Pema Ngodup for RFA's Tibetan Service. Translated by Tenzin Dickyi. Written in English by Richard Finney.







沒有共慘黨就有新中國!—— “愛國者的責任就是保護國家不受政府侵犯 - Thomas Penn”


merge image 20210827.png

渣共共慘支那國娛樂圈大整肅 整風運動 全面開啟 在渣共共慘支那國 只能允許一個偶像存在,那就是永遠偉光正的梁家河兩百斤精甚小學博士生刁禁評


【公子快報】趙薇突遭全網封殺,高曉松作品正在被下架!張哲瀚演藝事業泡湯,下一個被批鬥的明星是羅永浩?紅色中國重演革命排外風潮,狹隘民族主義已占上風...



2021-08-26

黑龍江口音的支國按摩女 法國里昂街頭對著渣共趙家人的中國銀行鋪面大肆當街發情



當傻逼真好,動不動就能感動得屁滾尿流,每天都過得很開心,不開心時就去看看中國銀行,還不開心就再去看看工商銀行。

國內到處都是中國銀行,在國內可以盡情的驕傲,為什麼要跑出去呢?

黑龍江口音的支國按摩女 法國里昂街頭對著渣共趙家人的中國銀行鋪面大肆當街發情

海外華人好sb啊大部分
別忘了遍佈全世界包括阿富汗的芝麻按摩女

這個嘛,確實是有點傻而且還很高調

鄉下雞進城...




刁近平履歷:


刁近平履歷:

習工農兵學員畢業後在軍委辦公廳當了三年秘書。 1982年5月習仲勛憑關系把他安插到河北正定縣。習搞了一個花巨資又爛尾的榮國府。習仲勛又把習空降到廈門當副市長。三年後由於政績和名聲不佳,又被調到寧德。三年後再升為福州市委書記。習領導建造福州長樂機場,嚴重虧損,五年虧損11億。

但他入選了趙家第5梯隊,仍舊被提升為福建省委副書記,省長。習同時從清華弄了個博士包裝。1997年十五大他入選候補中央委員,但得票倒數第一。2002年十六大他遞升為中央委員,得票倒數第二。2002年底習近平調任浙江省省長、省委書記。任內缺乏政績,2007年習升任上海,進入江澤民派系圈。

十七大中共黨魁及元老協商接班人。因習能力平庸,低調收斂,缺乏特色,無作為和愚笨兩派勢力都認為他即位後,易於籠絡。沒有威脅而意外勝出。2012年中共18大上,胡錦濤裸退,習太陽升起來了。習近平不懂經濟,但他靠反貪招攬人心,清除異己,聚斂錢財。習很崇拜毛,在很多方面刻意模仿毛。

上臺後,習以戰狼示人,硬懟世界。導致中美貿易談判破裂,美方重啟製裁。強行修憲搞終身制。違背50年不變的承諾,霸王硬上弓在香港強推國安法,造成香港糜爛。幾個月將中美關系倒退了40年。妄圖擴張中國影響力,終於引起世界警惕,成功地讓中國變成西方的頭號大敵。他搞的雄安新區工程行將爛尾。

習近平喜歡折騰,他加強對民企的管控,國進民退,大搞一帶一路大撒幣,血本無歸。習向世界隱瞞武漢疫情、延誤最佳防控時機。造成新冠的世界大流行。 借用奧巴馬評價拜登的話,永遠不要低估習近平把事情搞砸的能力。

【網路民議】支那共慘國土逼:“我們中國竟這麼強大,在法國里昂街頭也有咱們的中國銀行” ~~ “好激動,好感動哦!” 吼吼吼



你傻B走進去試試,看接待你不




【網路民議】"我們中國竟這麼強大,在法國里昂街頭也有咱們的中國銀行" ~~ "我好激動,好感動啊!"

8月26日,一位抖音視頻博主在法國里昂街頭看到中國銀行進而感嘆"祖國強大"的視頻遭到大量網民嘲諷。這位女士甚至在視頻末尾激動到眼含熱淚——"我就是覺得很自豪",這一"愛國表現"較為誇張,其本人也被調侃為中國銀行的"精神股東"。
img
file
也有网友指出这位女士身在海外且有一名外籍丈夫,这番表达或为收割爱国韭菜的"伏拉夫式"举动。
file
@张洲:换你你哭吗?我看完也是鼻头酸酸的。
以下評論由中國數字時代編輯搜集自網路:
    13SIYh49:她是精神股東,高興壞了,正常的。

    MeMoreKoo:太用力了吧。

    Sunny83846293:看把她激動的,她家在這家銀行里有股份還是咋滴?

    LIBAITIAN2323:銀行家設立銀行的標準是:那裡富裕哪裡貿易量大,就在哪裡設銀行。

    Muly390:為自己無關的事而驕傲的熱淚盈眶,對自己沒見過的人憎恨的咬牙切齒!

    CardCapMingze:她在驕傲什麼…在法國設有支行的外國銀行不下100家,你堂堂13億人大國要是一家都沒有才奇怪吧。

    wokanhaoni:那不是"中國銀行",那是"中國很行"(Zhong Guo Hen Xing)。這位女士,愛國還不夠徹底啊!

    Jacob43817149:這姑娘打算搶銀行麼?

    第四次的輪回:我覺得藥量得再加點。

    都小寶今天挨揍了嗎:咋能土鱉成這樣……

    南城大壞貓:表演欲望很強烈,但是演技浮於錶面。

    三吾之勝覽:民國就有了中國銀行!

    多米尼克E:沒有40年的腦梗說不出這種話,中國都加入世貿組織多少年了,中、工、建、交在主流國家基本都有開設分行進行跨國業務,卻成了她自豪的理由,敢情中國銀行是她家的。這兩年倒退的令人驚愕,什麼貨色只要和愛國、民族情緒搭邊,都能收割到流量、關註,愛國成了生意,自豪也可以無關本身。

    石頭上開了花兒:露臉拍這樣的視頻真的不怕認識的人說她精神有問題麼?

    握爪三寶:那等會逛到華人超市裡還有老乾媽不是要當場激動地心梗。

    M就愛裝文藝:但是中國銀行的賬戶里卻沒有你的餘額……

    小李探花闖江湖:誰特麼放她出去的。

    道長等我:一隻鴨被全德聚的收銀機感動哭了。

    我是分母我閉嘴:大清年間的移民。

    美麗人生99888:內心是自卑的,所有東西都需要放大和扭曲,才能匹配它們脆弱的心。

    tansuanm:當初就不同意她出院。
行尸走肉快点更新啊:看看他的评论区
file

不對外服務的銀行,共匪特有,洗錢專用

沒見過世面的土包子。

中國銀行是她家的嗎

一副傻屄樣,看面相就知道

不但人夠愚,看上去也沒見過什麼世面,還很容易動情入戲,各位有需要的聯系試試。

看她激動成這樣,腦子病的不輕

加入WTO後人家遵守公約讓你到人家的地盤上開銀行,而你呢?呵呵!之所以才會有無數這種神經病智障!

神經病吧!你去存個錢看看能不能存取!傻逼,都不知道這是幫你們用血汗賺來的納稅錢洗乾凈成它們自己家族的錢的凶手!

這麼強大還不趕緊回去祖國召喚你

這種傻逼海外華人圈裡占大多數

視頻里的女的是弱智 還是剛從精神病醫院里放出來

這丫肯定是牆里憋的,放出來看下世界激動壞了,但凡從牆里出來過的,只會對瑞士銀行感嘆一番。

哎……要是覺得驕傲就回來唄!別這麼忽悠呀

哈哈,我就喜歡看這斯的自豪感

真是鄉巴佬

好演員啊,說哭就哭了

也許人家在法國的中國銀行存了幾百億!能不激動嗎?

是要自豪的,不但是法國,全世界都因為中國戴上口罩,真行。

傻逼一枚 第一次出國吧!

這支那共慘國土逼對於法國銀行在中國境內有分行會有什麼感想?

一看就是土豪……或者和領導有關系的人

中國銀行有你多少存款 激動成這個逼樣

井底之蛙



Fwd: 【404文库】躺平时代2|重庆取消“双码联查”,是天掉馅饼?

【404文库】躺平时代2|重庆取消"双码联查",是天掉馅饼?


作者:蓝鹰

昨天,重庆电话哥的电话录音刷屏了——向当地纪委反应"强接疫苗"问题,且双方进行了沟通交流,电话哥的口才不是一般的,更重要的是勇气更不是一般的。我亲眼所见,这个视频转瞬间十万加转发量。不过,视频经历了几次生死转换。

当然,我也隐约为电话哥安全担忧。今天,他果然就有了一次做茶客的经历,好在有惊无险,目前已平安回家。
image
今天,重庆电话哥所致的影响效果就出现了,这是好的效果—"取消二码联查",意味着变相强打的取消。这算是好事,可是,这好事是天上掉下来的吗?
image
对此,文文再次感慨:权益是自己争取来的。为啥说再次感慨?因为每当我看到一些人勇敢站出来维护及争取公民全利,并获得成功时,我都会如此感叹。例如,我们总得为自己做点啥;例如,争的人多了,人间也就有了籽油。经常看我朋友圈的微友,都是知道的。

最近,在疫苗强打这事上,很多人都很愤怒,但多半是敢怒不敢言,最终选择屈从。他们的口头禅是:人在屋檐下,不得不低头。又或者是:胳膊拗不过大腿。诸如此类,不一而足。听起来都很有道理,甚至是深谙为民之道。实际上,他们根本就没有做过任何尝试,哪怕对胁迫的人心平气和地讲讲道理的可能性都放弃了。表现出极强的配合欲,生怕别人看出自己的叛逆而遭遇打击报复,至少不想因此穿小鞋。

如果说有人没有质疑的意识,那么,我倒是能够理解他们的选择。可对于已经懂得反思的人来说,他们依然和没有醒来的群体做同样的选择,我就感觉不可原谅。毕竟,有些事不能只停留在想而不做的层面,那就没有什么作用。你必须在关键时刻,付诸行动。这里的行动就是在某些人面前大声表达自己的观点,在合法的权益受到侵害时,就要竭力维护。

例如,重庆电话哥就是采用的这种方式。如实反应问题,并根据文书及法律依据等进行阐述强打的危害,因为强打违法违纪,伤害民意,给境外递刀子……如此这般之后,他提出警告和期待调整,回归正常。整个电话过程,有理有据有逻辑,但是,我必须强调的是—为争取自己的权益而表现出的勇气。在我们身边很多人比电话哥更加能说会道,上知天文下知地理,博古通今,口若悬河,但是,在涉及到风险话题时,他们就是一个木头桩子。

如果大家都如此的话,我们的社会进步从何而来?天赋人全,这话不假。但是,有人会悖逆天意,任性掠夺,你如果不大喝一声,他们或许会以为你很乐意让他们拿走的呢!一次又一次,掠夺者就会升级,从你的私人物品到你的生命健康,他们永无满足之时。

掠夺者都是贪欲使然,贪欲不受控的时候,就会无限膨胀,弱者就没有了生存空间。如同这一次,本来就不该强打,可就有人擅自变更,拿走属于我们的自主选择quan。我们必须力求拿回来。

你还当真相信:退一步海阔天空?很多时候,退一步,步步退,直到无路可退。所以,鸡汤也是要分情境的。不能当成万能药。

当然,争取说起来容易,做起来确实很难,而且有些风险还不可预估。我想,电话哥也是心中有数,我们这些人都有这样的体验,就算不是我们自己,也有我们熟悉的朋友为此付出很大代价。假如非常顺利,那么,就谈不上争取。假如没有风险,那么也就不值得争取。因此,必须有心理准备。明哲保身者,永远不会做这种尝试。那么,和争取者一样,人人都要为自己的选择负责。哈耶克说过:"愿意放弃籽油来换取保障的人,其最终既得不到籽油,也得不到保障"

罗马不是一天建成的,而是每一天的叠加。同样,蛮横的执法者也不是一天养成的,而是社会日积月累的纵容。现代公民有义务对quan力者进行监督,特别是当它们践踏到我们自身的利益时,更要与之较真,坚决说:NO!

这里我不得不提的是,三年大饥荒时,为啥安徽江西和河南饿S人最多?这里就涉及到地方棺猿的好大喜功、欺上瞒下的操行,比其它地方的棺猿要恶劣多。所以,地方差异很大原因和地方棺猿的管理方式有密切关系。

双码联查,重庆是取消了,这不是天掉馅饼,而是电话哥的争取,是数百万网友的转发支持,这其中有你我的一份转发之力。其它地方,还需要大家继续努力!相信依法治国,相信每一次努力,都会向籽油迈进一小步。一起加油!就是对电话哥最好的感谢。


萬般無奈:刁近平向普京“求救”未果,只好求神仙皇帝保佑.(2021.08.25)


萬般無奈:刁近平向普京"求救"未果,只好求神仙皇帝保佑.(2021.08.25)


普京:這病毒把我們(俄羅斯)也害得很慘我需要給我們國民一個交代不像你這麼牛逼。

和朝鮮談經濟發展,
和非洲談文化合作,
和塔利班談投資共贏,
和哈馬斯談反恐合作,
和俄羅斯談領土完整,
和世界上最強大的美國和歐盟互相製裁!
厲害國的一盤大棋!不得不服呀!


習近平不忙,是天下最悠閒的皇帝。
所有天災人禍,洪水,地震,瘟疫...都與他無關,照樣遊山玩水,飽食終日。唯一忙的就是割韮菜而已。


好像每年北戴河會議後他都去求神拜佛。去年北戴河後去的是敦煌。


不出去是沒錢了,如果有錢肯定一路撒幣去的


渣共國沒錢了,普京覺得習包子沒錢去大撒幣了,也就沒什麼利用價值了!


塔利班要錢,朝鮮要錢,非洲一大幫窮黑鬼要錢,俄要錢,間諜、大外宣要錢,巴鐵要錢,伊朗要錢,一帶一路要錢,包子把國庫掏空也不夠給。支國粉蛆韭菜炮灰們就是被榨成灰也不夠習包子大撒幣的。


誰願意跟笨還貪的紈絝子弟缺心眼敗家子一起玩兒呢


打電話去非洲嘛,聯合幾十個黑哥,組成打狗陣法,天下無敵。吼吼吼

2021-08-13

Fwd: 關於移民

看到有人說:不願意生活在一個把善良和單純當成缺點的國家。想一想挺有道理的。

"如果一個社會逼著你去做壞事才能過得好,那你可以考慮離開這里了"

移民 ——
如果是為了去天堂,那你一定會失望;
如果是為了離開地獄,那你一定不會失望。


2021-08-08

有個文工團 by 李承鵬 - 選自《全世界人民都知道》by 李承鵬



有個文工團 by 李承鵬
- 選自《全世界人民都知道》by 李承鵬


有個文工團
李承鵬

有個文工團,平時你是看不到它來服務的,它得好幾年才 上臺一次,它每次演出要從納稅人包里收取幾百億演出 費。每回表演成功,那些平時你永遠見不到的首長都會跑 去慰問,再用你的錢去嘉獎這些演員。而後,特別成功的 演員會成為官員,把上面的情景再來一遍。

如果你知道存在這樣一個神秘的文工團,肯定很不開心。 可是我要告訴你,這個文工團叫"奧運代表團"......奧運代表團就是一個文工團。平時看不到身影,每個演出周期要 四年,耗費幾百億資金,只負責表演,不負責普及訓練;只 負責天價拿回幾十個金牌,不負責讓13億民眾體質得到鍛 煉。它集中收費,集中排練,集中演出,集中宣傳,是個精 英演出團隊,與普通人的體育生活無關。

這時,肯定有一些熱愛舉國體制的朋友對我惡從膽邊生。 所以我要說明,我喜歡奧運,也並不反對某些項目的舉國 體制,我只反對為了養活這個文工團占據太多民眾的資源 ——很多地方一到夏天游泳池活像下餃子,一個癩疤足球 場會擠進十幾支球隊,好容易發現一羽毛球場網子還被管 理員摘掉了,理由是防小偷......公眾體育設施不對公眾開 放,因為這個文工團正代表公眾在裡面訓練。

到底占有多少資源?國家體育總局部門決算表顯示: 2011年度為39億6250.48萬元。記住,這只是賬本上顯示的財政 撥款、上級補助、事業經營收入等,未知雲量級的體彩抽成是否包含在內。好吧,就算一年40億,一個奧運周期就是160億;總局之下還有奧運金牌重要製造基地的地方體育 局,比如浙江省體育局2011部門安排支出決算是6億5324.80萬元。這樣的地方大局大概有十個,一年就是60億 ,一個奧運周期就是240億。還有小一些省級地方局如陝 西省體育局,2011年支出預算1億6835.27萬元。這樣的省 級局大概有15個。像渭南這種一年花三百多萬的市縣級體 育局,全國難計其數......所以一個奧運周期要花費500億 並非過份的數據,因為還未把全運會、城運會、青運會、專 項錦標賽這些"奧運戰略"環節的費用算進去。

雖然在這個國家,漲三毛錢水費大家都怨聲載道,但肯定 有不少的朋友要說:我就願意看奧運文工團,就願意為奧 運捐500億,因為我爽!我承認這個說法很有力也有道理, 因為捐給奧運總比捐給貪官喝茅臺好吧......後來,外籍教 練馬克就曝出:水上中心的領導經常喝茅臺卻不更換設 備。我也不去爭論你可以為了自己爽就給奧運捐但不能強 迫那些不喜歡奧運的也捐,這屬於強迫集資,以及500億這 個巨大的數經過了誰聽證誰授權......我只想跟你一起思考一個問題:

在幾百名奧運文工團員每四年向世界展示強健肌肉的時候 ,民眾體質持續下降。2011年9月2日國家體育總局官方公 布:與2005年相比,19-22歲年齡段爆發力、力量、耐力等 身體素質水平進一步下降,其中19-22歲城市、鄉村男生立 定跳遠平均成績下降1.29、0.23釐米;引體向上下降1.44、 1.45次;1000米跑平均下降3.37、3.09秒。城市男生、城市 女生、鄉村女生50米跑成績分別平均下降0.06、0.10、0.05 秒。各學段學生視力不良,13-15歲初中生為67.33%; 16-18歲高中生為79.20% ;19-22歲大學生高達84.72%。 7-22歲城市男生、城市女生、鄉村男生、鄉村女生超重檢出 率分別為14.81%、9.92%、10.79%、8.03%......比起日韓 ,全面下降!

全世界唯我國出現這麼一個奇怪現象:在外肌肉強勁,在 內氣喘吁吁;在外紅旗飄飄,在內紅燈大亮。很多學校體育 課已瘦身甚至取消了。可是我們還要因為"東亞病夫"而跟 人拼命。過去看《霍元甲》時我極端痛恨日本鬼子叫我們東 亞病夫,可後來才明白,是不是東亞病夫並不取決於拿了 多少金牌,而在於是否為民眾健康的體魄,修建一條清晨 的跑道。

第五次"全國體育場地普查''結果顯示,我國平均每萬人僅 擁有6.58個體育場地,日本平均每萬人擁有體育場地26 個、瑞士平均每萬人擁有體育場地22個、德國平均每萬人 擁有體育場地24.8個、義大利平均每萬人擁有體育場地20.2個。而很多網友知道,北京奧運的場地在曲終人散後 荒廢了多多,自行車賽場看臺上,鳥都生下第三代了。

我曾去過40多個國家,英國、柬埔寨、美國、埃及、荷蘭、 敘利亞、南非、阿聯酋......中國人去國外愛琢磨"中外區 別",我發現一個有趣的現象,你很難一時間總結這些不同 體制、不同觀念、不同膚色國家與中國的區別,但你一眼能 看出來的最大中外區別就是孩子:我們的孩子背書包的多 ,外國孩子帶滑板的多;我們的孩子戴眼鏡的多,外國孩子 戴球帽的多;我們的孩子坐著的多,外國孩子跑著的多;我 們的孩子見著球下意識要躲,外國孩子見著球會來一腳。總之,我們的孩子眼鏡多、胖子多、坐著的多。就是許三多。

有人說這是中國家長和學校的問題。可我認為這是同一個 問題,在計劃經濟的國度,舉國體制有些奪金優勢但占用 太多資源,就像一個縣規定電影院只能播映《建國大業》 宣傳《建國大業》學習《建國大業》,哪裡知道世上還有 《泰坦尼克號》。文藝和體育是同樣路數,雖然這些年在國 際雜技大賽里拿了很多名次,可你見過幾次它為民眾服務。官辦的中國文工團和官辦的奧運代表團,其實是一個 團。你看組織結構:總政歌舞團——八一體工隊,鐵路文工團——火車頭體協,四川省歌劇舞劇院——四川省運動 技術學院。一個主戰場是春晚,一個主戰場是奧運,一個表達溫馨祥和,一個闡述孔武有力,總之都是"咱們老百姓啊 ,今兒個真高興。"可是你看著每年貼心小棉襖的央視春晚 真很高興嗎?你看到為每四年一次的奧運花費五百個億不 少項目你連規則都拎不清,爽到不行嗎?你想想當春晚和 奧運盛景之時,民間的藝術生活越來越少,民眾的身體素 質越來越低,從沒見政府派出一個教練帶你鍛煉身體,連 夥伴們自行舉辦個城區業餘聯賽還要向當地足協交錢,否 則視為非法,還很高興嗎?

肯定還是有朋友說:"我高興,只要看見戰勝外國人我就高 興。"OK,戰勝外國人當然很高興,可當我們在乒乓、羽毛球、跳水、女子舉重水銀泄地戰勝外國人表示中國很高 興後,三大球不靈,能多高興?你看倫敦奧運三大球全軍盡沒,幾乎創造史上最差,這證明舉國體制不僅侵占群眾 體育資源,連職業體育也處境艱難。破壞了群眾基礎,精 英團隊難以選材。比如曾讓幾代中國人驕傲的中國女排,北京奧運勉強還拿了個銅牌,這次連四強都沒進,輸給的 還是日本隊......體制內高官都知道的秘密,人才不濟,選苗困難。因為我們一直在竭澤而漁,說不定哪會兒就爆發危機。

我尊重中國傳統優勢項目。可是大家心裡知道什麼叫國際 項目。國際項目是三大球、田徑、網球、游泳、職業拳擊和 職業賽車。這些才是真正高難度的項目,是幾十上百年來 被國際公認的巔峰競技項目,這些需要更多的基礎人才和 科學規律,需要金字塔基的參與人數。不是靠教練從山區 里拎一能吃苦的小孩,從小關在一個小屋子裡拼命練,像 栽盆景一樣栽出了冠軍。也不是像馬俊仁當年那樣跟王軍 霞說:霞啊,我夢見你前世是梅花鹿大仙兒,得跑,不跑就 會咯血而死,你跑,我給你解決城市戶口......這樣連蒙帶 騙創造了紀錄。參看趙瑜的《馬家軍調查》,就知道後來 它為什麼忽然就消失了。

有朋友說,我才不屌外國人籃球、足球這些項目,我就喜歡 中國傳統項目。那我無話可說。這仿佛中國文工團說,不 惜得跟外國人比芭蕾,我跟他們比秧歌......如果不需要與 國際接軌只需要自嗨,我誠心地想把麻將申請成為奧運項 目。再次聲明中國傳統項目的運動員值得尊敬,可中國體 育投入巨大,並非絕對搞不好三大球這些國際項目,而是 體育官員壓根兒沒想搞好。

這個邏輯必然揭開另一個話題:為什麼考核中國體育官員 的政績以金牌塊數論,而不是以影響力論?這是世界體育 史一個獨特現象。巴塞羅那長官會以巴薩為榮,因為這家 俱樂部改變了世界的踢球方式,傳遞了一種價值觀。可我們長官從不關心體育價值觀,只論金牌塊數,以方便年終 任末寫在政績匯報上。這直接導致他們撲向一些小眾、冷 門、性價比低的項目。中國體育官員金牌觀跟政府官員政 績觀是一樣的,不是以百姓實際幸福值論,而論開了多少 廠、修了多少高樓、製造了多少GDP。他們太重視數量而 不是質地、美感、影響力,他們不太像搞政治的,倒像是挖 土石方出身的,恨不得金牌以噸論,幸福感用秤稱。這跟老 百姓實際生活利益多大關系?

前幾天有個別致說法:舉國體制就是好,足球職業化了可 是更糟。可是中國足球是偽職業化好不好,正是因為政府 一直不放手,才煮了一鍋夾生飯。哪家大牌俱樂部背後不 是站著政府,當年大連那個著名的書記恨不得要親自沖進 更衣室指揮戰術。何況中國足球透明太高,中國體育那點 臟事兒,不過是被合謀掩蓋而已。

袁偉民說:我們是金牌大國,不是體育強國。不知是這個為 中國奧運團謀略了一輩子金牌的老人退前的感嘆,還是忽 生一絲悟意。喬丹跟你比金牌?馬拉多納跟你比金牌?他 們只比誰能改變世界。我們的金牌拿得夠多了,可所謂體 育強國,是不僅要拿回金牌,更要輸出體育價值觀,改變世 界對中國印象的不是金牌數,而是中國幫世界改變了什麼 運動理念。就像改變世界對中國印象的也不是GDP,而是 中國幫世界改變了什麼價值觀。前段時間羽毛球女雙故意 輸球,一部份人說缺乏職業素養且演技拙劣,另一部份人 說這是田忌賽馬合理利用規則。姚明說:田忌賽馬,馬也 要盡快跑啊。這就是運動理念。可惜這樣的理念太少。

回到開頭的論題,中國的文工團外出演出頻頻,也沒怎麼 輸出過文藝價值觀。到頭來外國人以為中國文藝工作者只 會頂壇子,就連電影界,數億元拍了個《金陵十三釵》,卻 敵不過只花了十五萬的《一次別離》。因為你只有價格觀, 沒價值觀。邏輯是,當你選擇了文工團模式,就放棄了普及,當你沒了 普及,就玩不動真正高質量的文體游戲。切進到兩屆奧運 爭吵不休的話題:一方說劉翔是可恥戲子,一方說劉翔是 悲情國家英雄。一些朋友希望我站隊表態,可我沒法在這 兩種觀點排他性表態,因為問題的根本:在極少人穿過專 業跑鞋,大多數人沒踩過專業塑膠跑道(學校里那一下雨 就積水一齣太陽就有味的不是塑膠跑道,是塑料跑道),全 國不足五千人練跨欄,很多縣城連合符專業標準的田徑場 都沒有......的國家,讓一個文工團員劉翔代表13億人奪冠 ,或者讓養活著半個文工團的頭牌團員真實宣佈因傷退演 ,再或者讓他通知幾十年習慣守看文工團為國爭光的人們 ,對不起,我實力不濟......根本不是文工團提倡的革命 觀。如果劉翔是戲子,正是文工團讓他必須完成的角色, 如果劉翔是悲情英雄,那是舉國的需求。上一屆他直接回 更衣室被罵得半死,這一屆他配合收看,單腳跳到110米終點。

長得兩分像周星馳的他終於一語成讖:我,只不過是一個 演員。在這個文工團里,劉翔盡力了,所以我不會瘋狂咒罵演員 劉翔,因為我知道誰使他成為演員。我希望他盡快回到正 常人的生活,他本該有權選擇退賽,沒必要成為世界上最大文工團的頭牌演員。但又傳出他要打2016,這實在讓人 覺得荒誕離奇。事情一開始就註定結尾,這個叫劉翔的團 員背後有一股力量,不僅是教練團隊、商業團隊的力量, 還有更大的力量,這股力量決定一切力量。明知不可為而 為之,明知該退而不準其退之,違背人性和科學規律來為 國爭光,其實中國式體育明星現象,就是我們大家的合謀。一片荒地上不小心長了一朵鮮花,它註定是要死的,為了 面子就插了塑料花。你罵塑料花有何用。文章寫到此時,牙 買加博爾特奪得200米金牌並成為史上首個蟬聯兩屆包攬 100、200米金牌的一哥。這個加勒比島國只有260萬人,卻 常年有260個專業級的田徑隊,超過8萬人在進行專業短跑 訓練。寫到此時,中國奧運文工團剛奪得史上第200金,來 自沒什麼人在練但中國一枝獨秀的跳水。

此時有沒有人想起這個偉大的文工團的一些模糊的名字, 賣藝的張尚武、搓澡工的鄒春蘭、殘廢的艾冬梅、那些付 出過很多卻一無所獲的無名小卒。

此前沈陽很多商鋪關門,傳言是為了明年的全運會打假和 集資。此時趙薇在微博上發了一條配照微博:嗨。遭到數千人謾 罵,說劉翔都受傷了,你還高興,真是商女不知亡國恨。這些,都是這個文工團的台外之戲,卻是題中之義。

為了準確表達通篇意思:
一、中國的奧運戰略在歷史上作 用巨大,伴隨幾代人青春;
二、文工團模式後患無窮;
三、體 育是一種權利,讓民眾享受這權利。

這個大國取得了很多非凡的成績,我希望她能取得非凡的成就。

10/08/2012

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

李承鵬:有個文工團


有個文工團,平時你是看不到它來服務的,它得好幾年才上臺一次,它每次演出要從納稅人包里收取幾百億演出費。每回表演成功,那些平時你永遠見不到的首長都會跑去慰問,再用你的錢去嘉獎這些演員。而後,特別成功的演員會成為官員,把上面的情景再來一遍。

如果你知道存在這樣一個神秘的文工團,肯定很不開心。可是我要告訴你,這個文工團叫"奧運代表團"……奧運代表團就是一個文工團。平時看不到身影,每個演出周期要四年,耗費幾百億資金,只負責表演,不負責普及訓練;只負責天價拿回幾十個金牌,不負責讓13億民眾體質得到鍛煉。它集中收費,集中排練,集中演出,集中宣傳,是個精英演出團隊,與普通人的體育生活無關。

這時,肯定有一些熱愛舉國體制的朋友對我惡從膽邊生。所以我要說明,我喜歡奧運,也並不反對某些項目的舉國體制,我只反對為了養活這個文工團占據太多民眾的資源——很多地方一到夏天游泳池活像下餃子,一個癩疤足球場會擠進十幾支球隊,好容易發現一羽毛球場網子還被管理員摘掉了,理由是防小偷……公眾體育設施不對公眾開放,因為這個文工團正代表公眾在裡面訓練。

到底占有多少資源?國家體育總局部門決算表顯示: 2011年度為39億6250.48萬元。記住,這只是賬本上顯示的財政撥款、上級補助、事業經營收入等,未知雲量級的體彩抽成是否包含在內。好吧,就算一年40億,一個奧運周期就是160億;總局之下還有奧運金牌重要製造基地的地方體育局,比如浙江省體育局2011部門安排支出決算是6億5324.80萬元。這樣的地方大局大概有十個,一年就是60億,一個奧運周期就是240億。還有小一些省級地方局如陝西省體育局,2011年支出預算1億6835.27萬元。這樣的省級局大概有15個。像渭南這種一年花三百多萬的市縣級體育局,全國難計其數……所以一個奧運周期要花費500億並非過份的數據,因為還未把全運會、城運會、青運會、專項錦標賽這些"奧運戰略"環節的費用算進去。

雖然在這個國家,漲三毛錢水費大家都怨聲載道,但肯定有不少的朋友要說:我就願意看奧運文工團,就願意為奧運捐500億,因為我爽!我承認這個說法很有力也有道理,因為捐給奧運總比捐給貪官喝茅臺好吧……後來,外籍教練馬克就曝出:水上中心的領導經常喝茅臺卻不更換設備。我也不去爭論你可以為了自己爽就給奧運捐但不能強迫那些不喜歡奧運的也捐,這屬於強迫集資,以及500億這個巨大的數經過了誰聽證誰授權……我只想跟你一起思考一個問題:

在幾百名奧運文工團員每四年向世界展示強健肌肉的時候,民眾體質持續下降。2011年9月2日國家體育總局官方公佈:與2005年相比,19-22歲年齡段爆發力、力量、耐力等身體素質水平進一步下降,其中19-22歲城市、鄉村男生立定跳遠平均成績下降1.29、0.23釐米;引體向上下降1.44、1.45次;1000米跑平均下降3.37、3.09秒。城市男生、城市女生、鄉村女生50米跑成績分別平均下降0.06、0.10、0.05秒。各學段學生視力不良,13-15歲初中生為67.33%;16-18歲高中生為79.20% ;19-22歲大學生高達84.72%。7-22歲城市男生、城市女生、鄉村男生、鄉村女生超重檢出率分別為14.81%、9.92%、10.79%、8.03%……比起日韓,全面下降!

全世界唯我國出現這麼一個奇怪現象:在外肌肉強勁,在內氣喘吁吁;在外紅旗飄飄,在內紅燈大亮。很多學校體育課已瘦身甚至取消了。可是我們還要因為"東亞病夫"而跟人拼命。過去看《霍元甲》時我極端痛恨日本鬼子叫我們東亞病夫,可後來才明白,是不是東亞病夫並不取決於拿了多少金牌,而在於是否為民眾健康的體魄,修建一條清晨的跑道。

第五次"全國體育場地普查''結果顯示,我國平均每萬人僅擁有6.58個體育場地,日本平均每萬人擁有體育場地26個、瑞士平均每萬人擁有體育場地22個、德國平均每萬人擁有體育場地24.8個、義大利平均每萬人擁有體育場地20.2個。而很多網友知道,北京奧運的場地在曲終人散後荒廢了多多,自行車賽場看臺上,鳥都生下第三代了。

我曾去過40多個國家,英國、柬埔寨、美國、埃及、荷蘭、敘利亞、南非、阿聯酋……中國人去國外愛琢磨"中外區別",我發現一個有趣的現象,你很難一時間總結這些不同體制、不同觀念、不同膚色國家與中國的區別,但你一眼能看出來的最大中外區別就是孩子:我們的孩子背書包的多,外國孩子帶滑板的多;我們的孩子戴眼鏡的多,外國孩子戴球帽的多;我們的孩子坐著的多,外國孩子跑著的多;我們的孩子見著球下意識要躲,外國孩子見著球會來一腳。總之,我們的孩子眼鏡多、胖子多、坐著的多。就是許三多。

有人說這是中國家長和學校的問題。可我認為這是同一個問題,在計劃經濟的國度,舉國體制有些奪金優勢但占用太多資源,就像一個縣規定電影院只能播映《建國大業》宣傳《建國大業》學習《建國大業》,哪裡知道世上還有《泰坦尼克號》。文藝和體育是同樣路數,雖然這些年在國際雜技大賽里拿了很多名次,可你見過幾次它為民眾服務。官辦的中國文工團和官辦的奧運代表團,其實是一個團。你看組織結構:總政歌舞團——八一體工隊,鐵路文工團——火車頭體協,四川省歌劇舞劇院——四川省運動 技術學院。一個主戰場是春晚,一個主戰場是奧運,一個表達溫馨祥和,一個闡述孔武有力,總之都是"咱們老百姓啊 ,今兒個真高興。"可是你看著每年貼心小棉襖的央視春晚真很高興嗎?你看到為每四年一次的奧運花費五百個億不少項目你連規則都拎不清,爽到不行嗎?你想想當春晚和奧運盛景之時,民間的藝術生活越來越少,民眾的身體素質越來越低,從沒見政府派出一個教練帶你鍛煉身體,連夥伴們自行舉辦個城區業餘聯賽還要向當地足協交錢,否則視為非法,還很高興嗎?

肯定還是有朋友說:"我高興,只要看見戰勝外國人我就高興。"OK,戰勝外國人當然很高興,可當我們在乒乓、羽毛球、跳水、女子舉重水銀泄地戰勝外國人表示中國很高興後,三大球不靈,能多高興?你看倫敦奧運三大球全軍盡沒,幾乎創造史上最差,這證明舉國體制不僅侵占群眾體育資源,連職業體育也處境艱難。破壞了群眾基礎,精英團隊難以選材。比如曾讓幾代中國人驕傲的中國女排,北京奧運勉強還拿了個銅牌,這次連四強都沒進,輸給的還是日本隊……體制內高官都知道的秘密,人才不濟,選苗困難。因為我們一直在竭澤而漁,說不定哪會兒就爆發危機。

我尊重中國傳統優勢項目。可是大家心裡知道什麼叫國際項目。國際項目是三大球、田徑、網球、游泳、職業拳擊和職業賽車。這些才是真正高難度的項目,是幾十上百年來被國際公認的巔峰競技項目,這些需要更多的基礎人才和科學規律,需要金字塔基的參與人數。不是靠教練從山區里拎一能吃苦的小孩,從小關在一個小屋子裡拼命練,像栽盆景一樣栽出了冠軍。也不是像馬俊仁當年那樣跟王軍霞說:霞啊,我夢見你前世是梅花鹿大仙兒,得跑,不跑就會咯血而死,你跑,我給你解決城市戶口……這樣連蒙帶騙創造了紀錄。參看趙瑜的《馬家軍調查》,就知道後來它為什麼忽然就消失了。

有朋友說,我才不屌外國人籃球、足球這些項目,我就喜歡中國傳統項目。那我無話可說。這仿佛中國文工團說,不惜得跟外國人比芭蕾,我跟他們比秧歌……如果不需要與國際接軌只需要自嗨,我誠心地想把麻將申請成為奧運項目。再次聲明中國傳統項目的運動員值得尊敬,可中國體育投入巨大,並非絕對搞不好三大球這些國際項目,而是體育官員壓根兒沒想搞好。

這個邏輯必然揭開另一個話題:為什麼考核中國體育官員的政績以金牌塊數論,而不是以影響力論?這是世界體育史一個獨特現象。巴塞羅那長官會以巴薩為榮,因為這傢俱樂部改變了世界的踢球方式,傳遞了一種價值觀。可我們長官從不關心體育價值觀,只論金牌塊數,以方便年終任末寫在政績匯報上。這直接導致他們撲向一些小眾、冷門、性價比低的項目。中國體育官員金牌觀跟政府官員政績觀是一樣的,不是以百姓實際幸福值論,而論開了多少廠、修了多少高樓、製造了多少GDP。他們太重視數量而不是質地、美感、影響力,他們不太像搞政治的,倒像是挖土石方出身的,恨不得金牌以噸論,幸福感用秤稱。這跟老百姓實際生活利益多大關系?

前幾天有個別致說法:舉國體制就是好,足球職業化了可是更糟。可是中國足球是偽職業化好不好,正是因為政府一直不放手,才煮了一鍋夾生飯。哪家大牌俱樂部背後不是站著政府,當年大連那個著名的書記恨不得要親自沖進更衣室指揮戰術。何況中國足球透明太高,中國體育那點臟事兒,不過是被合謀掩蓋而已。

袁偉民說:我們是金牌大國,不是體育強國。不知是這個為中國奧運團謀略了一輩子金牌的老人退前的感嘆,還是忽生一絲悟意。喬丹跟你比金牌?馬拉多納跟你比金牌?他們只比誰能改變世界。我們的金牌拿得夠多了,可所謂體育強國,是不僅要拿回金牌,更要輸出體育價值觀,改變世界對中國印象的不是金牌數,而是中國幫世界改變了什麼運動理念。就像改變世界對中國印象的也不是GDP,而是中國幫世界改變了什麼價值觀。前段時間羽毛球女雙故意輸球,一部份人說缺乏職業素養且演技拙劣,另一部份人說這是田忌賽馬合理利用規則。姚明說:田忌賽馬,馬也要盡快跑啊。這就是運動理念。可惜這樣的理念太少。

回到開頭的論題,中國的文工團外出演出頻頻,也沒怎麼輸出過文藝價值觀。到頭來外國人以為中國文藝工作者只會頂壇子,就連電影界,數億元拍了個《金陵十三釵》,卻敵不過只花了十五萬的《一次別離》。因為你只有價格觀,沒價值觀。

邏輯是,當你選擇了文工團模式,就放棄了普及,當你沒了普及,就玩不動真正高質量的文體游戲。切進到兩屆奧運爭吵不休的話題:一方說劉翔是可恥戲子,一方說劉翔是悲情國家英雄。一些朋友希望我站隊表態,可我沒法在這兩種觀點排他性表態,因為問題的根本:在極少人穿過專業跑鞋,大多數人沒踩過專業塑膠跑道(學校里那一下雨就積水一齣太陽就有味的不是塑膠跑道,是塑料跑道),全國不足五千人練跨欄,很多縣城連合符專業標準的田徑場都沒有……的國家,讓一個文工團員劉翔代表13億人奪冠,或者讓養活著半個文工團的頭牌團員真實宣佈因傷退演,再或者讓他通知幾十年習慣守看文工團為國爭光的人們,對不起,我實力不濟……根本不是文工團提倡的革命觀。如果劉翔是戲子,正是文工團讓他必須完成的角色,如果劉翔是悲情英雄,那是舉國的需求。上一屆他直接回更衣室被罵得半死,這一屆他配合收看,單腳跳到110米終點。

長得兩分像周星馳的他終於一語成讖:我,只不過是一個演員。

在這個文工團里,劉翔盡力了,所以我不會瘋狂咒罵演員劉翔,因為我知道誰使他成為演員。我希望他盡快回到正常人的生活,他本該有權選擇退賽,沒必要成為世界上最大文工團的頭牌演員。但又傳出他要打2016,這實在讓人覺得荒誕離奇。事情一開始就註定結尾,這個叫劉翔的團員背後有一股力量,不僅是教練團隊、商業團隊的力量,還有更大的力量,這股力量決定一切力量。明知不可為而為之,明知該退而不準其退之,違背人性和科學規律來為國爭光,其實中國式體育明星現象,就是我們大家的合謀。

一片荒地上不小心長了一朵鮮花,它註定是要死的,為了面子就插了塑料花。你罵塑料花有何用。文章寫到此時,牙買加博爾特奪得200米金牌並成為史上首個蟬聯兩屆包攬100、200米金牌的一哥。這個加勒比島國只有260萬人,卻常年有260個專業級的田徑隊,超過8萬人在進行專業短跑訓練。寫到此時,中國奧運文工團剛奪得史上第200金,來自沒什麼人在練但中國一枝獨秀的跳水。

此時有沒有人想起這個偉大的文工團的一些模糊的名字,賣藝的張尚武、搓澡工的鄒春蘭、殘廢的艾冬梅、那些付出過很多卻一無所獲的無名小卒。

此前沈陽很多商鋪關門,傳言是為了明年的全運會打假和集資。

此時趙薇在微博上發了一條配照微博:嗨。遭到數千人謾罵,說劉翔都受傷了,你還高興,真是商女不知亡國恨。

這些,都是這個文工團的台外之戲,卻是題中之義。

為了準確表達通篇意思:
一、中國的奧運戰略在歷史上作用巨大,伴隨幾代人青春;
二、文工團模式後患無窮;
三、體育是一種權利,讓民眾享受這權利。

這個大國取得了很多非凡的成績,我希望她能取得非凡的成就。