Powered By Blogger

2015-06-25

左轉彎的悲劇!遭人加速撞尾 還是你輸

左轉彎的悲劇!遭人加速撞尾 還是你輸
文、圖/楊世勝
June 25, 2015, 8:30 am 8422 次


​

去年10月的一天下午,我跳完尊巴舞(Zumba)後駕車回家,於道路交叉口信號綠燈下停住,打上左轉燈,準備轉入另一街。這時,我看到反向約25呎處一車駛來。由於距離較遠,按當時的速度,我判斷有時間完成左轉,並快速反應。可是當車尾轉入另一街後,兩車呈90度時,聽到車身被撞擊的聲音。

June 25, 2015, 8:30 am 8416 次《《 回上一頁閱讀前文

......下車後,我發現我的右車尾被對方車的右前身猛烈撞擊,後桿「粉身碎骨」,灑在各處,右側燈全毀,而對方車因是主動衝擊,力量較大,導致其前右側及乘客邊門嚴重受損。幸虧撞擊處離我駕駛位較遠,雖然受到驚嚇,但身體未受損。

警察很快趕刻到,他們先查看各人的駕駛執照,再進入警車查詢駕駛紀錄。我告訴他們,我在離對方相當距離處左轉,但是該車非但不減速,反而加速才碰到我的車尾。警察說,你可以寫入事故報告中。

肇 事者是位年僅19歲的青少年,車子是其母親的,車內還有一位年輕人。我問他:你為何開得如此快速?這種事故完全應該避免。他說:沒有看到你的車。時值晚上 7時,路燈和車燈通明,我能看到到,他也應該能看到。如果真如他所說,那麼唯一的可能是這二個年輕人在車內相視地交談,而忽視了前方的車輛。

警 察填寫了事故信息單(Accident data)後,交給了雙方,內容主要包含了事故的日期、時間、地點、氣候狀態、各自的保險公司和損害的部位等,並要我們速去警察局領取撞車報告 (Crash report),填好後分別交到當地警察局、麻州交通局和保險公司。這份共四頁的報告書要求提供汽車的乘客人數、駕駛的地點、方向和速度、氣候狀態、撞擊 地點和部位,還要畫出示意圖,詳細描述事故發生的前因後果。

級別猛降 保險費劇增

我的車子尚能發動。按保險的公司的通知,我把車送至鄰近指定的起亞車行(KIA)。不久,收到保險公司的通知:修理費為3537元。按照我的保險總額選擇頁第七項的碰撞規定,我自付500元。

隔 了幾天,又收到一份通知書說,經過雙方保險公司和州保險處的討論決定,按照安全駕駛保險法的有關條文,當駕駛人進行左轉或U轉穿過在同向或反向行駛車輛的 車道時,若發生碰撞,要承擔一半以上的責任,除非能提供足夠的證據來推翻,並把我的保險費調整等級從很高的99降到4,總保險費從年度的706元升至 1303元。這一次就增加了597元。信中還要我在數周內交清,否則罰款。

我的車是被他車主動衝撞,為何要我為此承擔主要責任?我實在無法接受這一點,決定提出申訴。我填好「申訴表」(Appeal Form),連同補充報告 (Supplemental report)及50元手續費寄至州保險處申訴委員會,靜候聽證。

保護直行 左轉彎判輸

我 等了四個多月,最後獲得了當面陳述的機會。對方保險公司首先宣讀我對事故的報告,接著聽證官員問我有何補充,我出示了照片,說明了我是判定與他車有足夠的 距離下進行左轉的,但對方在交叉路口的瞬間加速才造成了對我後車部位的撞擊,這是我無法預測和控制的。我還還分析了對方駕駛告訴說「沒有看到我的車」是否 是與乘客視目交談所致等。我自從駕車以來僅發生過幾次外來的小碰小擦,並請他們查看近卅年內的良好駕駛紀錄,保險費每年遞減。這次是我所遇到過的最大被撞 事故,我是無辜的。

聽證會不到十分鐘就結束了,說在二周內有書面決定。沒隔幾天,我就收到了麻州保險處申訴委員會的裁決書 (Finding)。書中說,由聽證官和委員會主持人簽署的文件是維持(Upholds)原來決定。其理由是,我沒有在距離和速度上作出適當的判斷來保證 對方在其車道上的無阻礙行駛。很顯然,這一法規是傾向於維護在原車道行駛者的權益,對左轉或U轉者是很不利的。如果由此發生碰撞,轉彎者則是因阻礙了對方 的行駛,而負有主要責任。至於由於對方的突然間加速要衝過交叉口或不看前方所致,則在條款內沒有說明。

裁決書中還附有向高級法院申訴的過程:付20元向申訴委員會索取裁決和申訴的拷貝,連同附上275元(這是最少的)作為申請費,一起寄給高級法院,並說本人無需再出席。法院在分析所有材料後,如果發現地方法院所提供的證據不足以支持以前的裁決,則有可能被推翻。

我 在法院等候聽證時,聽到幾個人議論到:保險處的申訴委員會不是獨立的機構,和保險處有著其共同的利益鏈,通過聽證來否定原有決定的案例很少。我的案例不也 是如此嗎?我想,申訴至上級法院,只是閱看原有的文件,結果恐怕不會有改變,又要化上一筆錢,再賠上不少時間,最後決定放棄。

進行反思 左轉要當心

這 一系列的降級、罰款、申訴、裁決等,使我重溫了交通法規,特別是有關左轉和U轉的法律責任。實際上,在轉彎時,大部分人會等待車輛過去,或在足夠的距離下 執行。而對方的車在看到要求左轉的信號燈時也會停下,禮讓通過。像這種對已經完成轉彎的車輛,不但不減速,反而加速成90度的衝擊,則是極少見的。這也危 及肇事者本人的安全。最近看到交通事故率的報道,其中65%的事故是由18歲至22歲的青少年所致,包括超速、用手機、車內交談、醉酒等。這次我算是碰上 釘子了,只好自認倒霉。

通過對這一車禍的全過程反思,我認識到:作任何左轉或U轉,必須要十分小心,最好在無車輛時進行。若有時不可能,則一定要按距離及速度留有餘地的情況下再執行,因為這條法規強調了在原有道上駕駛人的權益。

法 規也提到如能提供足夠的證據可能來推翻,但問題是他車的瞬間加速是很難取證的,即使在交叉口有錄像,但對一般的碰撞是不易取得的。另外,我也缺乏事故處理 的經驗,對方的駕駛曾告訴我:他沒有看到我的車,導致碰撞。雖然我告訴了警察,但沒有要求馬上取證,記錄在事故單上,使我失去了這一有力的證據。開車轉彎 每天會碰到,可是對相關法規深層地理解還是初次,也很期待與讀者分享我的一點經驗和教訓,防患於未然,以在事故處理中獲得應有的權益。


Fwd: 央企腐败有三大“黑洞”,且呈现明显的‘集团化’、‘家族化’趋势


央企腐败有三大"黑洞",且呈现明显的'集团化'、'家族化'趋势
2015-06-21 菏泽关注

本文来自中新网报道。原文照转,看官自品。根据巡视调查结果,超过一半的央企招标采购不规范、亲属利益输送现象严重,中移动、中电信都存在蚕食国有资产的行为。唉,既然如此不好管,既然蚕食国有资产的现象这么严重党纪国法都难禁,还要出动这么大规模的巡视组付出这么高的调查成本才能起到掀起腐败一角看一眼的效果,为什么还要让这么大规模的经营性国有资产存在呢?费劲。

截至19日晚,中纪委网站全部公布了今年中央首轮巡视的反馈情况。13个中央巡视组为26家央企列出"问题清单",其中,招标采购不规范、海外资产管理漏洞、亲属利益输送成为央企三大"黑洞"。

逾半数央企招标采购不规范

梳理此次巡视反馈可见,在本轮被巡视的26家央企中,招标、采购不规范现象十分普遍。包括国家电投、国家电网公司、中建总公司、国电集团、武钢集团、中国核工业集团公司等在内的十余家企业,都被指出在物资采购、工程项目招标过程中存在缺乏监管问题,腐败隐患大。

在中建总公司,中央第七巡视组指出,企业对工程招投标、项目分包、劳务外包、物资采购、资金收付等重点领域的监督制约机制不健全。

另外,中建总公司还被指"招投标领域腐败问题易发多发,有的在工程竞标中围标串标陪标,在项目分包中不公开招标或违规操作、营私舞弊,有的出借资质挂靠经营或非法转包。"

国家电投则被指在投资并购、工程招标、物资采购等领域违规违纪问题突出,暗箱操作、贵买贱卖、领导人员直接插手等问题时有发生。

中国核工业集团公司被指,"工程建设招投标缺乏监管,物资采购管理不到位",中国东方电气集团有限公司和国家电网公司有企业领导被指利用物资采购收受贿赂。此外,华能集团、国电集团等企业存在不公开招标或违规招投标问题。

北京航空航天大学教授任建明接受中新网记者采访时表示,招标采购是国有企业腐败"易发环节"。

他分析称,国有企业采购额相当惊人,这背后存在巨大利益诱惑,企业管理者作为"代理人",很容易出现"慷国家之慨"为自己的"小圈子"谋利的心理。加之国有企业体制和党政机关相似,存在权力过度集中现象,因此在招标采购过程中很容易发生以权谋私、贪污腐败现象。

监管鞭长莫及?央企海外资产管理漏洞凸显

本轮巡视发现,国有资产管理疏漏众多,遭蚕食现象严重。

在反馈中,中国移动、武钢集团和中国电信均被指存在蚕食国有资产的问题。国电集团则存在"滥用职权,侵占国有资产,在经营和企业并购中向民企输送利益"问题。

值得一提的是,央企在境外的项目投资与资产管理成为问题"重灾区"。中国海油被指海外投资监管不到位,通用技术集团、宝钢集团、中国电子则存在海外资产管理或监管不力。

此外,反馈中还指出,中国核建存在"对海外公司和工程项目缺乏监管,违反财经纪律问题多发",国机集团亦对海外工程项目缺失监管。

任建明分析指,如果说国有企业资产在境内的监管存在难度,那么对其在海外的资产及项目的监控更是鞭长莫及,因为存在空间距离,掌握企业境外资产信息的难度要更大。

"国企在实施'走出去'战略、扩大海外市场的同时,也迫切需要解决配套的监管制度问题,否则这些企业就更容易失控,令国有资产漏洞百出、不断失血。"任建明强调说。

亲属利益输送现象显著

除招标采购不规范、海外资产管理存漏洞外,"利益输送"在此次巡视反馈中也成为高频词。

在中建总公司、中船重工、中远集团、宝钢、武钢、中石油、华能集团、南方电网、东方电气、中国核建、中国移动、国投公司、中化集团、中国五矿、大唐集团、国电集团等16家央企中,巡视组均发现一些领导亲属利益关联交易,搞利益输送,存在"靠啥吃啥"问题。

中建总公司有企业领导人员利用国企资质、资金、资源谋取私利,配偶、子女等围绕中建系统承揽业务。中国五矿被指"领导人员帮助配偶、亲属经商谋利,与民企老板相互串通、输送利益"。大唐集团中有的领导干部安排亲属子女直接或间接在集团下属企业违规持股谋利。

两家钢铁巨头宝钢集团和武钢集团,均被点名存在"以'钢'谋私"。巡视组在对宝钢的反馈中,直言其存在"'靠钢吃钢',利益输送问题严重"。

"国有企业腐败呈现明显的'集团化'、'家族化'趋势",任建明强调,造成这一现象的原因主要有两点,一方面,过去二三十年中,对此类贪腐行为的打击力度不够,一些人把国有资产当成"唐僧肉",抱着"不吃白不吃"的心态,并且越发胆大妄为。

另一方面,过去一段时间国有企业改革进程推进缓慢,有些企业改成了"夹生饭",到今天还具有"双重性"——既具有政府性质,也具有企业性质,这使得企业处于内部监督体制不到位、外部控制机制缺失的状态,因此有必要进一步推进国企改革,使之成为真正的企业,而不是为个人牟利的工具。

2015-05-21

长平观察:究竟谁在煽动民族仇恨?

长平观察:究竟谁在煽动民族仇恨?

人权律师浦志强以涉嫌煽动民族仇恨罪及寻衅滋事罪被起诉。时评人长平认为,这是一个机会,让人思考民族歧视政策和仇恨教育。

(德国之声中文网)遭受一年之久的关押审查之后,人权律师浦志强被北京市第二检察院提起公诉,涉嫌罪名是煽动民族仇恨和寻衅滋事。据报道,起诉书中唯一的罪证来自浦志强发表的数条微博。

中国刑法中的寻衅滋事罪是指随意殴打他人,追逐、拦截、辱骂他人,或者在公共场合起哄闹事,情节恶劣的行为,曾经被称作流氓罪。近年来,这个罪名被广泛用于惩罚政治异议言论,显得十分滑稽。如此滥用刑法,本身就是一种流氓作派。

煽动民族仇恨罪在汉人中并不多见。2014年,原中央民族大学教师伊力哈木·土赫提被指控的"罪行"包括散布分裂思想,煽动民族仇恨。2013年,喀什地区莎车县、英吉沙县法院以"煽动民族仇恨、民族歧视"等罪,判处9名维吾尔族人5至10年徒刑。

浦志强以参与公共事件推动人权和法治为人所知,针对民族问题仅仅发表了一些常识性的意见。警方和检察院花了一年时间搜罗到的所有这类意见,加起来也不过三 五条微博。这些微博意在批评中共民族歧视政策,谴责武警和军队在新疆和西藏的粗暴用武,呼吁民族权利,思索民族和解之道,"煽动民族仇恨"从何谈起?

刑法中将煽动民族仇恨罪与民族歧视罪相提并论,这是十分恰当的,因为真正的仇恨来自歧视。对浦志强的指控,让很多网民有机会思考,究竟谁在煽动民族仇恨, 施行民族歧视?正如网民指出的那样,在中国,中共控制了所有的舆论机器,掌握了制定民族政策的绝对权利,只有它可以做到煽动民族仇恨和民族歧视。

部分汉族异议人士被限制出境,正常的通行权利受侵。对于少数民族来说,往往是整片地区,甚至整个民族都很难取得护照,或者护照被收缴。藏人到拉萨还需要特 别通行证,维吾尔人到内地旅游不让住旅店,不让上网。汉人的大部分公共场所已经不用强制挂领袖像了,而藏人的寺庙里还被要求挂上。汉人可以较为自由地穿衣 打扮了,而维吾尔人却不可以蓄须和穿长袍。

中国否认在少数民族地区实行殖民统治,但是却完全按照殖民统治惯例,只让汉人担任少数民族地区一把手职务。有些汉人辩解说,这跟北京或上海的一把手必须由 日本人或美国人担任不同,汉人和少数民族同属中华民族,不分彼此。既然如此,为什么不对等地规定在一些汉人地区必须让少数民族人担任要职呢?

Chinesischer Journalist Chang Ping

长平

大权在握的中共应该对目前新疆、西藏和内蒙等紧张的民族关系负全部责任,检讨并纠正民族歧视政策。中共宣传总是把责任归咎到境外势力及受其影响的国人教唆。如果少数民族如此容易被洗脑,中共自身的宣传教育和利益诱惑不是更直接、更广泛和更充分吗?

有人指出,中共的爱国主义教育,本身就是大汉族主义和仇恨教育。抗日宣传片教人仇恨日本人,内战宣传片教人仇恨国民党人,为了拒绝民主制度又教人仇恨西方人。依靠军队和武警镇压反对者,是仇恨和暴力最有力的宣扬。

需要强调的是,将呼吁少数民族平等权利的人治罪,这本身就是一种严重的民族歧视。不仅剥夺少数民族自身的言论自由,而且恐吓和阻止一切揭露真相和说出常识的声音,为了继续维持专制统治下的歧视政策。

长平是中国资深媒体人、时事评论作家,现居德国。


毕福剑事件背后的社会“认知失调”


2015年05月19日 06:28 AM
毕福剑事件背后的社会"认知失调"

2015年4月,毕福剑事件引发舆论热议,甚至险些引发外交事件,目前这一事件正渐渐平息,但是,对其背后更广泛的社会心理探讨却并不足够。

毕福剑和传说中的"五毛党"有一个共同的"理论教父"——美国人李昂.费斯廷格(Leo Festinger)。 费斯廷格是美国社会心理学家,他著名的"认知失调理论"(cognitive dissonance theory)就符合"五毛党"这种现象的思维逻辑,这个理论也能够为毕福剑事件提供合乎人类心理运动规律的解释。更有意思的是,这个理论可以告诉我们 "五毛党"的价格为什么定在"五毛",而不是更多或是更少。

按照认知失调理论,当个体的行为与其信念相左,或者当个体的公开言论与其真正的想法相悖时,这就会形成一种"认知失调"的状态。

"认知失调"主要有三种类型,一种是"被迫遵从"所带来的,第二种是"抉择后果"带来的,第三种是新知识新信息带来的。后两种与本文关系不大,这里不予讨论。毕福剑和"五毛党"所承受的是第一种,人们为了避免惩罚或获取奖励而被迫在公开场合发表与自己真实思想不符的言论。

从一定程度上说,毕福剑和传说中的"五毛党"都是为了得到奖赏而被迫遵从,发表与私下真实意见不符的言论,并因此产生了心理上的"认知失调"。问题是,为什么毕福剑得到的"奖赏"比"五毛党"大得多,而"五毛党"却比毕福剑更忠诚呢?

费斯廷格认知理论给出了很好的解释。1959年,费斯廷格和他的合作者Carlsmith一起做了一个实验,他们要求三组大学生执行一项任务, 就是把盘子里的螺丝钉枯燥地旋转一个小时,并要求三组中的两组学生以自己刚刚完成的工作很有趣为论据,帮助实验员去说服等待室里的人参加实验。大学生完成 这个撒谎任务后,一组大学生每人得到了1英镑,另一组每人得到了20英磅。最后,三组学生中打最高分、认为工作有趣的,不是不需要撒谎的一组,也不是虽然 需要撒谎、但得到了可观的20磅奖赏的那一组,而是需要撒谎、只得到了1英镑的一组。

费斯廷格对这一现象的解释是,虽然后两组大学生都因为对别人发表了与自己的个人经验所得出的知识相悖的意见,因而都产生了"认知不调",但得到20 磅奖励的外部因素调节的一组,因不需要内部的自我调节,在实验的最后调查环节仍能够保持自己的真实想法;而只得到了1英镑的一组,则因外部调节因素不足以 驱除心理上的不适感,不得不进行内部自我调节——暗示自己:其实转螺丝钉的活动也没那么讨厌,甚至可能还有人会劝慰自己:这锻炼了自己的忍耐能力。

因此,费斯廷格告诫:"如果你想让人不只是公开遵从,而是随后也改变其私下的真实观点时,最好的做法是:只提供恰好足以诱导出遵从行为的奖赏,"如 果奖赏高于这个点,人的认知失调就会被外部调节因素(高奖赏)降低,人就不需要通过改变自己私下的真正想法以进行内部调节,可能的结果就是:人们公开场合 说一套,私下仍然保持自己的想法,奖赏高出那个"恰好足以诱导遵从行为的点"越多,人们私下保持自己真实思想的程度越强,毕福剑大概就属于这种情况。

从这个意义上地讲,毕福剑的做法符合人类心理运动的逻辑,与"不知感恩"或者"吃饭砸锅"无关。这里费斯廷格的告诫揭示了的另一个很多人意想不到的 情况是,"五毛党"在收钱发帖的同时,很可能会慢慢转变自己原来对世界和事件的个人想法,变成真正的"自干五"。这可能算是"五毛党"这种制度的妙处之 一:那不只是一场交易,还是一场针对"五毛党"自己的思想改造活动。

但是,费斯廷格指出,奖赏的程度太低也不行,奖赏太低首先可能发生"诱导失败"的情况,即无法诱导出"遵从行为";而最大的危险还在于,当奖赏程度 不足,也会发生认知不调,并会向相反的方向调整自己的意见,即更加坚定地坚持自己真实的思想而拒斥那个企图诱使自己公开表达的观念,而且,这个没有达成的 奖赏的数量越高得接近于那个可诱发遵从行为的点, 人们的认知失调的程度就越强烈,坚持自己真实思想的力量也越强烈。

可见"五毛"(并非确切数字,只是指代较低的报酬)这个价格制定十分"凶险",可以说差之毫厘,就可能谬以千里,过高,就会造成"毕福剑",而且高 得越多越"毕福剑";而低一点点就会造就一批死硬反对党。从实践的结果来看,目前的这个奖励的程度不多不少,恰好足以诱发目标人群的遵从行为,既节省了资 源又导致忠诚。ouyu

还有一点,按照认知失调理论,除了价格之外,导致"五毛党"忠诚的还有另一要素,就是在设计认知失调行为时,给参与者预留了发挥个体"创造性"的空 间。五毛党需要发挥个人才智创作出质量最高的帖子,而不是简单地抄写和重复,费斯廷格也曾通过一系列的实验证明,让一个人创造性地表达与自己真实想法相悖 的观点,比只是简单地朗读或默读更容易导致其改变原来的想法。

无论是精英毕福剑还是草根"五毛党",作为社会现象,都与中国社会特殊的政治生态有关。长期以来,中国人一直生活在在官方和民间双重话语体系中。这 两重话语体系在很多问题上难达一致,如对领袖人物和一些事件的评价。双重话语体系并存的原因有二,第一,官方话语体系是政治统治的基础,必须存在;第二, 民间话语体系无法被彻底消解,不得不允许存在。

但是,官方似乎从未曾放弃运用手中的资源扩充官方话语体系、挤压民间话语体系。毕福剑和"五毛党",实际上就是这种双重话语体系造成的认知失调的精 确体现。这也体现了国家机器的两方面属性。一方面,对五毛党这样的草根, 精确计算价格, 以最大限度地施加认知失调的方式, 把他们规训成适合政治需要的人,同时又把这些人用作工具去规训更多的他人,这是国家机器的冷酷僵硬的一面。而对以毕福剑为代表的精英式工具的塑造体现的则 是国家机器柔韧而富有弹性的一面。自文革大规模暴力规训和改造精英失败后,官方和精英逐渐找到了更好的相处方式,并逐渐达致默契——官方不再要求毕福剑们 绝对忠诚,而是对其保有的私人话语空间的现象采取容忍态度,只要这些精英在公共空间放弃私人话语、坚持官方话语,即可相安无事,甚至获得名利奖赏。

两种工具要达到的效应不同,"五毛党"要达成的是"邻人效应",毕福剑要营造的则是"偶像效应"。无论"邻人"或"偶像",其目标指向都是草根大 众。也正因此,毕福剑事件中受伤害最深的是他的大众草根粉丝,毕福剑在央视节目和饭局视频中的两种截然不同的话语逻辑使这些大众粉丝深陷"认知失调"的强 烈不适感之中。当然,精英们因为自己已经渐渐如鱼得水的、与权利和谐相处的默契被打破也产生了不安全感,因而发起了对"无耻告密者"的道德笞伐。

事实上,在双重话语体系下,几乎每个人难以避免不同程度的认知失调,包括孩子们。北京著名的中学历史教师袁腾飞的历史观和官方制定的教材不同,当孩 子们认同和接受袁老师的历史观而同时又希望在考试中获得高分时,必然要承受强烈的认知失调。而袁老师在决定究竟是照本宣科还是同时也提供另外一种自己认同 的历史观给孩子们时,也要承受认知失调。

认知失调会让人感到压力、不舒服,因此,大范围的社会认知失调必然会使生活的幸福感大打折扣。更为严重的的后果是,这种双重话语体系和社会认知失调 可能会大范围地制造虚伪的精英和缺乏独立思考能力的庸众。当我们的社会充斥着这两种人时,才会有那么多的社会戾气,民族的创新能力就无从谈起了,而今的 "中国梦"也就只能是一种话语体系中的"梦"。

(注:本文仅代表作者个人观点。作者为资深财经媒体人。现旅居英国,正在英国卡迪夫大学攻读博士学位。本文责编:霍默静 mojing.huo@ftchinese.com)



2015-04-30

秦晖:谁是中国真正的朋友和敌人

秦晖:谁是中国真正的朋友和敌人

2015-04-01

我讲两个最极端的例子,大家知道东南亚地区这两三百年经常排华,但是东南亚国家中基本上没有发生过排华事件的国家,也就是对华人 最好的国家是哪个国家呢?大家可能都知道应该是泰国。历史上东南亚这些国家几乎都发生过大规模排华事件,就是泰国没有发生过。可是泰国在东南亚这些国家 中,70年代曾经我们认为是最坏的国家,那个时候官方对泰国的说法是美国等反动统治集团统治的国家,而且我们当时支持泰国共产党在他们那里搞革命,我们的 昆明曾经设过泰国共产党的电台,在那里天天骂泰国,而且骂得很厉害。那个时候越南跟我们的关系就好很多,可是越南对华侨、对华人、对华商都很坏,基本上是 对他们实行剥夺政策的。而且老实说,这个剥夺政策也不是1978年中国和越南翻脸了以后才有的,在这之前就已经剥夺了,可那个时候中国跟越南的官方关系还 是很不错的。但是越南并不是最坏的,那个时候最坏的是……


听众:印度尼西亚。


秦 晖:不是印度尼西亚,老实说印度尼西亚是不是比越南更坏都是一个问题,但是毫无疑问,比越南和印度尼西亚要坏得多的是柬埔寨的.红色高棉.。柬埔寨的红色 高棉对华人已经不是剥夺的问题了。红色高棉统治柬埔寨只有三年多的时间,但是华人人口下降了三分之二,死了三分之二。红色高棉屠杀华人,不光是屠杀所谓的 富有的华人,甚至连侨共也杀。什么是侨共呢?就是华侨中的共产党,当时不属于红色高棉,而是属于中共系统的。侨共在红色高棉时期几乎全部被杀光,死亡率比 一般华侨还要大。但是大家知道那个时候红色高棉是我们中国的铁哥们,为了红色高棉,我们不仅敢得罪泰国,也敢得罪越南。为了拯救红色高棉,我们跟越南打了 一仗。也就是说对华人最坏的国家,我们认为是最友好的国家,对华人最好的国家我们认为是最敌对的国家。


现 在其实也是一样,比如说在工业化国家中,我们知道如果要说对华人、华侨、华商最开放、最友好的国家,其实大家都知道不管喜不喜欢,这是一个事实,毫无疑问 就是美国。哪怕就是民主国家,像欧洲,对华人当然也不能说坏,但是老实说在欧洲华人要像美国那样的融入主流社会仍然是不可能的。欧洲的华人不可能像美国那 样,很多人成为高官,很多人成为教授,很多人成为大科学家,进入主流社会。欧洲的华人基本说只能做两件事,一件事就是开餐馆,一件就是做皮鞋那种手工作 坊,别的事情很难做。我们的很多朋友都是在欧洲获得了学位,他们的导师在学术界有很高的评价,但是他们要在大学中谋职是非常非常困难的,要比美国困难得 多。


但 是欧洲毫无疑问也不是最差的,俄罗斯要比西欧对华人、华侨、华商糟得太多,现在中俄关系很密切,到过俄罗斯的人很多,他们是怎么对待华人的?当然了,其实 华人自己也有很多毛病,这个我们应该承认,包括坑蒙拐骗、假冒伪劣,但是这些东西西欧的华人也有,西欧却为什么没有这样对付华人?包括去年发生的那个.新 星号事件.就不是虐待华人的问题,还公开打死了几个华人海员,像这样的事情在其他工业化的国家中都不可能发生。但是现在又是俄罗斯跟我们关系最好,欧洲次 之,美国是我们的敌人。我觉得有一个很大的问题,就是我们现在的外交,只要你拍.皇上.的马屁就是友好国家,哪怕把我们的公民、我们的同胞杀得再多还是友 好国家。假如你不讨我们.皇上.的喜欢就是敌对国家,哪怕对我们的同胞再友好都没用,我觉得这样的外交是很奇怪的。如果这样,我们国家所谓的.再崛起.对 一般的国民是没有什么好处的。可以想像,如果我们国家进一步崛起了,像那种现在和我们友好的那些国家越来越多,比如说和我们友好的国家有缅甸等,那些国家 如果多起来,还有我们中国人的活路吗?


我 前不久去了一趟东南亚,有人告诉我一件事。大家知道缅甸也是我们的铁哥们,因为它跟西方不好,就跟我们很好。我们在缅甸搞了一座桥,我方建议要把它命名 为.缅中友谊大桥.,但缅甸军政府不同意,要把它命名为他们将军的一个名字,我印象中好像叫金友大桥(音)(注:我没找到这座桥)。当时中方也就同意了, 但是这个大桥落成之后给当地华人社区发了邀请,结果大桥落成的时候这些人都不来,为什么呢?后来一了解才知道,原来那个将军就是在 1964年缅甸排华的时候屠杀华人的罪魁祸首,当地的华人对他痛恨得不得了,但就是这样的人是友好人士.。所以我觉得所谓"中国人民站起来了"这句话该怎 么理解?在缅甸这样的国家中国人站起来了吗?这的确是一个很有意思的现象。


我 不想涉及那么敏感的问题,我只是说就算我们把这些问题——也就是国家的地位到底是皇上的地位还是国民的地位——先放在一边,仅仅就一般意义上的国家权益而 言,1949年这场变化到底带来了什么改变?所谓"中国人民站起来了",我就不说公民权利了,我只说所谓的主权,——至于人权和主权谁大,我姑且不说。那 么1949年以后中国国家权益,或者说所谓的主权,到底有哪些增进?哪一个不平等条约是1949年废除的?哪一块领土是1949年收复的?哪一点经济权 益,包括海关权益,各种权益在内是1949年获得的?不管是大的还是小的。我相信没有一个人能够回答出来!的确是找不到!


我 们都知道近代中国损失了很多国家权益,包括不平等条约,租界、外国在华特权,包括领土的丧失。为了改变这一点,中国人付出了极大的努力,而且也取得了很大 的进步。但是平心而论,绝大部分的进步都发生在1949年以前。1949年以后也取得了进步,比如说收回香港和澳门,但是与1949 年本身有很远的距离。我觉得1949年以后中国国家权益的收复,平心而论最早的一个进步应该是在1954年,斯大林死了以后,赫鲁晓夫上来,他的地位比较 脆弱,他当时对中国是最友好的。不过我这里要讲,对中国最友好的人往往都不得好报,这个人后来就成为被中国骂得很厉害的人。是赫鲁晓夫把斯大林从中国夺走 了的那些东西都还给了中国,像旅顺、大连和新疆的很多所谓的苏资公司,这些都是1954年以后赫鲁晓夫归还给中国的。但是在这之前,从1949年到 1954年,我相信没有一个人能提出中国的国家权益在这五年中有什么增进。中国的国家权益的恢复是一个比较漫长的过程,我前面有一段话,虽然大家都说 1949年的革命变化很大,的确这个革命是在国共两党之间进行的一场斗争,国共两党的确有很多不同,这应该承认。但是我前面曾经提到,国共两党的不同,与 国共两党和中国其他势力的不同相比,应该是要小得多。我们以前经常把国共两党之外的那些势力叫作中间势力,或者叫作第三势力。


推荐阅读"秦晖金雁文集"


出境游客拖累中国软实力?

2015年04月29日 06:41 AM
出境游客拖累中国软实力?

北京方面在建立亚洲基础设施投资银行(Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank,简称亚投行)问题上让华盛顿蒙羞,可能使2015年成为全球经济权力平衡显著倒向中国的时刻而被载入史册。

但现实是,全球经济秩序的结构变化很少引起普通人的注意。而全球旅游秩序的结构变化却并非如此:我们都关心如今哪些人在成群结队地游览金字塔或卢浮 宫。中国推动自己的民众排队购买百老汇(Broadway)门票的能力,远比其在亚洲基础设施融资方面发号施令的能力更令我们大多数人担忧。

而奇怪的是,北京方面对此却是最为关心的。内地游客是中国全球软实力攻势的一个重要部分;如果他们在国外丢脸,那国家形象也会受损。因此,中国政府已经采取措施,旨在促使内地游客规范自己的旅游行为。

中国国家主席习近平去年访问马尔代夫时说:"要教育我们的公民到海外旅游讲文明。矿泉水瓶子不要乱扔,不要去破坏人家的珊瑚礁。"

当然,只是到了近期,人们才不得不担心中国人的矿泉水瓶。直到世纪之交,普通中国公民出境旅游仍然受到严格限制。自那以后,出国旅游增长了10倍,使中国成为世界最大的国际旅行消费国。去年,中国出境游总计达1.17亿人次。

随着出境人数的增多,有关不文明行为的媒体报道也多了起来。仅在过去几个月,中文报纸就报道了:内地游客用开水烫伤了一位亚洲航空 (AirAsia)的空姐,起因是针对座位分配以及他们是否要为泡方便面的开水付费发生争执;四名中年妇女因恼于小孩哭闹而在飞行途中大打出手;几名女性 乘客之间爆发了一场撕扯头发的互殴,起因是一个历来非常伤脑筋的问题,即文明人应该被允许将座椅靠背向后倾斜到何种程度;以及多个反复上演的场景——旅客 为了"呼吸新鲜空气"而强行打开飞机的紧急逃生舱门。

还有旅客坚持行使逃脱安检这一不可剥夺的权利。而在北京方面看来,最糟糕的旅游新闻头条是2013年一名中国少年在卢克索神庙的涂鸦事件:一个本应通晓事理的古老文明对另一个古老文明的侮辱。

中国旅游研究院(China Tourism Academy)院长戴斌指出,"航班无名火"并不仅限于中国人。而且,由于中国有更多游客,在航班上自然就会发生更多不愉快。中国的出境游仍处于起步阶段。改变需要时间。

中国政府的一项新要求是:具有一定规模(未明确)的旅游团要包括一名"综合素质好的游客"来督导其他成员的行为。一则官方评论称,"文明督导员必须 掌握一些理论来劝导其他游客",而且"要有勇气指出其他人出现的不文明行为,并帮助他们改正(那些行为)"。对此,我们只能说,祝好运。

北京方面的管制手段可能是全世界最严格的,但普通中国民众似乎非常不善于服从命令。他们从未停止让我感到惊讶,例如,在中国有多少假装失聪的飞机乘 客?他们能够听到有什么吃的可选,却听不到关闭手机或是抬高自己座椅靠背的指令。有一份报纸认为,彼此熟识的游客可能会服从文明督导员,而对于那些互不相 识的游客,可能需要给他们提供旅游折扣以鼓励他们举止得体。

这一定足以让一位独裁者痛哭:如果你无法阻止中年妇女在经济舱里相互撕扯对方的头发,那威权主义还有什么意义呢?不过,作为曾是世界上最不受欢迎的 旅游"王朝"——丑陋美国人的美国——的公民,我想说:不论在亚投行还是在洲际事务中,要习惯成为重量级人物都需要时间。但没人比中国人学得更快:他们会 马上将手伸向垃圾回收箱,并为保护珊瑚礁而展开激战。

译者/陈隆祥

靠教育有用吗?生活在自由平等文明社会的人们自然也会谦逊文明,反之大家都懂得,常言道,一方水土养一方人。中共国有软实力吗?

FT社评:美国种族问题依然难解


2015年04月29日 13:18 PM
FT社评:美国种族问题依然难解

不久之前,美国曾相信自己已经攻克了暴力犯罪这种流行病。"零容忍"和"三振出局"是美国社会上世纪90年代反复重申的信条,其结果是凶杀率下降。如今,信条已失效。在巴尔的摩,又一名手无寸铁的黑人男性在被警察局拘留期间死亡,之后爆发的骚乱正愈演愈烈。

美国有230万人在监狱,"零容忍"政策产生了全世界最大的囚犯人口。美国的监狱比威权制度下的中国还要满,而中国人口是美国的4倍多。这一政策还 让上世纪60年代民权运动时代取得的部分进步付之东流。数万名黑人男性因为微小的过错坐牢,而犯同样过错的白人男性受到的责罚不会比打手心重多少。美国选 出了首位黑人总统也说明不了什么。一代黑人认为自己背负着烙印,他们的不满无人理会。如马丁•路德•金(Martin Luther King) 1968年遇刺前所说:"暴动是不被倾听者的语言(A riot is the language of the unheard)。"

然而黑暗中的一抹亮色是,有迹象显示,美国政界已开始应对这个巨大的难题。比尔•克林顿(Bill Clinton)担任总统时曾是上世纪90年代刑罚改革的主要推动者。最近他承认,当时的做法"过头了"。在他担任总统的那个年代,任何一位政界人士如被 视为"对犯罪心慈手软",都难以承担这带来的政治后果。如今,两党都认同需要减少美国囚犯人数、给那些有过犯罪记录的人更公平的重新做人的机会。

这是一个积极的变化。美国警方的悄然军事化不仅未能让凶杀率持续下降,反而制造了一种逍遥法外的文化,导致每年有数百名手无寸铁的平民被枪杀。只有 一小部分涉事者被要求承担责任。难怪,从密苏里州的弗格森到马里兰州的巴尔的摩,很多地方的人们与本应保护他们的警察产生隔阂。难怪,许多黑人男性觉得自 己被排除在社会给予其他人的机会之外。问题是:该怎么办?

最重要的是承认挑战的复杂性。继去年夏天18岁、手无寸铁的迈克尔•布朗(Michael Brown)在弗格森遭枪杀后,巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)成立了"21世纪警务工作特别小组"(Task Force on 21st Century Policing)。这个小组的建议值得称赞,但缺乏实际价值。它的报告聚焦于如何重建警察和社区之间的信任。一些其他团体则认为应强制警察巡逻时佩戴随 身摄像机。

更令人鼓舞的是全面改革美国刑罚制度的建议。美国的毒品法实际上起了反作用。在美国的部分地区,白人青年现在可以合法吸食大麻,而在其他地区,黑人 青年仅仅拥有大麻就会面临终身监禁。美国半数州所采取的"三振出局法"也是如此。有关强制判决的一些数据清楚显示它存在种族偏见,因此必须终结。非暴力罪 犯也应能清除他们的犯罪记录。好在这里也有希望的曙光。极端保守的科赫(Koch)兄弟最近加入了"禁止查问"(ban the box)运动,该运动倡导雇主不询问求职者的犯罪记录,直到进入后期的面试程序。

再就是领导人的问题。出于可理解的原因,奥巴马对美国黑人青年的异化程度一直保持沉默。但现在他已经没什么好损失的。20世纪50年代和60年代, 美国富有感召力的领导人将一代可能会走向激进主义的年轻人引向更具建设性的抗议。现在能办到这一点的人只有奥巴马。在历任美国总统中,他最不该留下让种族 冲突继续发酵的政治遗产。

译者/何黎


2015年04月29日 06:41 AM
奥巴马:巴尔的摩骚乱是"发酵的危机"

美国总统巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)感叹美国"缓慢发酵的危机"。在巴尔的摩发生自1968年马丁•路德•金(Martin Luther King)遇刺以来最严重的骚乱之后,国民警卫队(National Guard)官兵被部署到这个港口城市的街头巷尾,市民们开始清理。

25岁的黑人弗雷迪•格雷(Freddie Gray)在被警方羁押期间,由于至今无法解释的脊椎损伤而丧生。周一晚上,在他的葬礼之后,巴尔的摩爆发了严重暴力活动。事件发生后,奥巴马呼吁改革美 国各地的警察局,并对其进行重新训练。他还倡议发起整体努力,通过教育、就业培训和基础设施投资为贫困社区带来更多机遇。

在昨日白宫举行的记者会上,奥巴马表示:"这是一场已持续一段时间的缓慢发酵的危机,不是什么新情况。"

奥巴马提到密苏里州弗格森市警方射杀一名黑人少年后引发的激烈抗议。他说:"自弗格森事件以来,我们已看到太多似乎是警方妨碍个人的案子,而这些个人往往是非裔美国人和穷人。这种事几乎每周都会发生。"

他说,骚乱是"少数犯罪分子和暴徒"挑起的,这些人"需要被当作犯罪分子对待"。在巴尔的摩,警方的直升机在空中盘旋之际,市民们加入了携带清洁器材的志愿者的行列,大家都希望帮助该市西部蒙道敏区(Mondawmin)从周一爆发的暴力活动中恢复过来。

与姐妹一道来提供支持的辛西娅•斯旺(Cynthia Swann)表示:"昨天我哭了一整天。"

斯旺女士强调,她并不宽容暴力行为。但她补充说,骚乱分子所发泄的不满情绪,整个社区都能感觉到,其原因是她所称的当地警方频繁的苛待。

格雷死后,6名警员已被停职,司法部正展开调查。斯旺表示:"多年来,西区警察一直把这个社区踩在脚下。"她还补充说,居高不下的失业率加剧了紧张局面。

智库——司法政策研究所(Justice Policy Institute)表示,蒙道敏区45%的劳动年龄人口没有工作。同时,长期高企的高中逃课率目前为33%左右。

现年29岁、从小认识格雷的纳撒尼尔•爱德华兹(Nathaniel Edwards)表示:"他们会坚持到正义得到伸张为止。"

马里兰州已宣布进入紧急状态。州长拉里•霍根(Larry Hogan)表示,5000名国民警卫队官兵及另外5000名来自其他州的警察已被调往巴尔的摩。

译者/简易

万达的生意经 Chinese Power Player Places Risky Bet on Moviegoing (本文最初发表于2012年5月25日)

2012年06月26日

万达的生意经

DAVID BARBOZA

北京——因为北美电影市场的不景气,好莱坞的电影公司对中国表现出了更大兴趣。

沃尔特‧迪斯尼公司(Walt Disney Company)及其子公司漫威娱乐(Marvel Entertainment)旗下的曼威工作室(Marvel Studios)正在中国制作《钢铁侠3》(Iron Man 3);新闻集团(News Corporation)近期入股北京的博纳影业集团;同中国有关部门达成的一项协议将允许更多美国公司发行更多电影,美国片方还将从中国这个世界增长最 快的经济体中获得更多的票房分账。

不过,至少有一位商界的亿万富豪押注美国电影市场,认为那里依旧是通向国际成功的入场券。他是位中国人。

王健林是位白手起家的大亨,如今正收购AMC娱乐(AMC Entertainment),这是仅次于帝高娱乐(Regal Entertainment)的北美第二大院线。他承诺要将AMC整合到一个新的、中国制造的全球品牌中,这一品牌叫万达集团。

王健林现年57岁,被视作中国最成功的房地产巨头之一。他旗下170亿美元的帝国涵盖巨型商业地产开发项目、五星级酒店、度假村、一家影视制作公司,以及亚洲最大的电影院线。

现在,万达斥资26亿美元收购AMC,藉此在全球拓展其势力范围。此项交易于周日公布,尚有待美国监管当局批准,但无迹象表明交易可能受阻。 本次收购昭示王健林个人的新纪元,亦彰显中国的发展进入一个新时代。中国企业正走出低端制造业,进军海外以寻求自然资源与全球消费品牌,这是中国经济升级 努力的一部分。

在北京宽敞的总部接受采访时,万达集团董事长王健林称,他正在斟酌自己的下一个海外目的地:欧洲。

"我们正在进行谈判,"王健林说。

万达是一家私营企业,在这个国家占主导地位的是国有企业。但AMC并购案同中国政府的优先目标紧密对接,这些目标包括:鼓励中国企业"走向全球";推进中国媒体和娱乐产业全面变革;更为重视居民消费。

北京的决策者也有意提升中国的"软实力",意图在国际上拓展其文化影响力,而电影产业被认为是达到此项目最富前景的途径之一。

但有24年历史的万达集团毕竟缺乏国际经验,在分析人士看来,它能否使如此规模的并购案获得成功,并创建一个全球房地产与娱乐品牌,仍是未定之数。

"中国拥有出色的企业家。但问题是:他们将如何带领企业走向国际?他们愿意学习并做出改变吗?"博达克咨询有限公司(BDA China)——一家位于北京的投资顾问公司——董事长邓肯‧克拉克(Duncan Clark)指出。

这一领域最大的试验之一,正由王健林实施。他出身行伍,将一家小小的房地产公司发展为一个全国性品牌。万达起家于大连,后将其总部迁入北京万达广场,旗下开发或运营的物业总面积高达1.83亿平方英尺。

王健林15岁初中毕业后从军,据他自称,1988年,他辞去大连地方政府官员的职位,借来8万美元创办了一家企业;现在,他称自己的企业是一头"飞奔的大象"。

中国商业地产联盟创办人王永平称,王健林总是能比中国其他房地产巨头们先行一步。

"他有远见,"王永平说(王永平同王健林无亲属关系):"大家都盯着住宅市场时,他跳出来专注商业地产;大家都追捧商业地产时,他的目光转向文化和旅游产业,这些产业是政府目前正在强调和培育的。"

虽然很少有中国企业成功建立全球品牌,王健林对此却并不担心。在他看来,投资于一家专注于"看电影"这种地道的美国式体验的公司,似乎没什么好害怕的;毕竟他经历过文化大革命,那段时期中国的社会与政治均陷于疯狂之中。

"在制定目标和执行战略方面,万达是成熟的,"王健林说:"我们拥有完善的体系和部门。如果目标没有达到,黄灯就会亮起来。"

王健林称,通常都能达到目标。去年,尽管市场处在下行中,公司仍获得30%的增长。而且,他说到2030年,公司营业总收入将达到300亿美元。

这就让人不解了:为什么在美国电影市场不佳,票房收入疲软,美国的电影制作人正将目光投向中国之际,还要来投资?

有分析人士暗示,王健林收购AMC有政治目的,旨在讨好中国领导人——他们希望通过文化产品出口推进中国的国际影响力。还有人称,王健林热衷于将自己树立为中国的第一位全球企业领导人。

一位熟悉万达-AMC谈判,但未获授权对此作出评论的公司高管称:"对他(王健林)来说,这是一个声明式的买卖:他要从中国走出去,这个领域他很有兴趣。他不断强调,要学习如何在美国运营影院。这不仅是为了钱。"

但为了做成这笔交易,万达需要很多钱:超过30亿美金现金,包括承诺在北美投资于AMC的5亿美元。眼下信贷环境艰难,中国房地产市场又处于下跌中,筹到如此巨额金钱实非易事。最终,这笔现金将主要来自中国的国有大型银行。

为确保交易成功,王健林称,他将以长期薪酬激励保留AMC的管理层不变,并大量投资翻新老旧美国影院,以提高营业收入。

当被问及AMC是否会放映中国政府不喜欢的影片时(比如反映西藏叛乱的争议作品),王健林称,他不会干涉美国的管理团队所作的决策。

对于中国国内有人认为王健林同失势的政治局委员薄熙来的关系可能会给万达造成伤害(薄熙来也起家于大连),他做出了反驳。

"我们认识,彼此非常熟悉。但仅限于工作关系,没有私交。"王健林说。据他称,政府并未要求调查万达集团。

整个采访过程中,王健林说话时冷静、沉重,偶尔捻一下拇指。他说自己专注于目标和战略执行,速度要快。

他说,收购一家好莱坞制片厂并不在他的计划中,但也不排除这种可能性。他又说,酒店和美国的购物中心是更有可能的目标。

"我们没有房地产走向全球的战略,"王健林说:"但为了全球化和走出去,我们有意收购酒店和酒店管理公司。我们也喜欢百货商店。"

Zhang Wei在北京、Gu Huini在上海为本文提供研究支持。

本文最初发表于2012年5月25日。

翻译:韩松

June 26, 2012

Chinese Power Player Places Risky Bet on Moviegoing

By DAVID BARBOZA

BEIJING — Hollywood studios, facing steep challenges in the North American movie market, are taking more interest in China.

The Walt Disney Company and Marvel Studios, a division of Disney's Marvel Entertainment subsidiary, are producing "Iron Man 3" in China. News Corporation recently bought a stake in the Bona Film Group in Beijing. And an agreement with Chinese authorities will allow more American companies to distribute more movies and reap a greater share of the box office in China, the world's fastest-growing economy.

But at least one billionaire businessman is betting that the American movie market is still the ticket to international success. And he is Chinese.

Wang Jianlin, a rags-to-riches tycoon, is taking over AMC Entertainment, North America's second-largest movie theater chain behind Regal Entertainment. And he is promising to integrate it into a new, made in China, global brand called the Wanda Group.

Mr. Wang, 57, is regarded as one of the most successful Chinese real estate tycoons. His $17 billion empire includes huge commercial property developments, five-star hotels, tourist resorts, a film and television production company and Asia's largest cinema network.

Now, by paying $2.6 billion to acquire AMC, the Wanda Group is extending its reach globally. The deal, announced Sunday, is still subject to the approval of United States regulators, though there are no hints it will be blocked. The purchase signifies a new era for Mr. Wang and in China's development. Companies here are moving away from low-cost manufacturing and going abroad in search of natural resources and global consumer brands, part of an effort to upgrade the nation's economy.

In an interview at his spacious headquarters in Beijing, Mr. Wang, the Wanda chairman, said he was pondering his next international destination: Europe.

"We're already negotiating," he said.

Wanda is a private company in a nation dominated by state-owned enterprises. But the AMC deal is closely aligned with the Chinese government's priorities, which include encouraging Chinese companies to "go global," pushing an overhaul of Chinese media and entertainment properties and placing greater emphasis on consumer spending.

Policy makers in Beijing also want to bolster China's "soft power" capabilities to extend its cultural influence internationally, and the film industry is considered one of the most promising avenues for doing so.

But whether Wanda, a 24-year-old enterprise with little international experience, can make a success of such a big acquisition and create a global property and entertainment brand is debatable, analysts say.

"China has great entrepreneurs," says Duncan Clark, chairman of BDA China, a Beijing-based investment advisory firm. "But the question is: How will they take these companies international? Are they going to be willing to learn and adapt?"

One of the biggest experiments in this area is being undertaken by Mr. Wang, a former army officer who has turned a tiny real estate venture into a national brand. Wanda, which started in Dalian, a northeastern city, and moved its headquarters to Wanda Plaza in Beijing, is a colossus with 183 million square feet of land under development or operation.

In 1988, Mr. Wang — who entered the army at 15, after middle school — says he left a job as a local government official in Dalian and borrowed $80,000 to start a business he now describes as a "sprinting elephant."

Wang Yongping, founder of the China Commercial Real Estate Association, described the chairman of Wanda as usually a step ahead of other Chinese real estate barons.

"He always has a vision," Mr. Wang, no relation, said. "When everybody was doing housing property, he jumped out to focus on commercial property. When everybody was chasing commercial property, he was eyeing culture and tourism — the industries that the government is stressing and cultivating."

That few Chinese companies have managed to establish global brands is of little concern to Wanda's chairman. And buying a stake in a company focused on a quintessentially American experience — moviegoing — seemed hardly daunting for a man who survived the Cultural Revolution, a period of social and political madness in China.

"In setting goals and executing a strategy, Wanda is sophisticated," said Mr. Wang, the Wanda chairman. "We have good systems and departments. If targets are not reached, a yellow light goes off."

Mr. Wang usually hits his targets, he says. The company has experienced 30 percent growth in the last year, even in a down market. And he promises that by 2015 the Wanda Group will have overall revenue of about $30 billion.

Which raises the question: Why invest in the United States cinema market at a time of weakness, when box office receipts are sluggish and American film producers are looking to China?

Some analysts have suggested that Mr. Wang's acquisition of AMC was political, an effort to curry favor with Chinese leaders, who are pushing their nation to enhance its influence by exporting cultural products. Others contend that Mr. Wang is eager to establish himself as China's first global corporate chief.

"This is kind of a statement deal for him," said an executive familiar with the Wanda-AMC talks, but not authorized to discuss them. "He's coming out of China, and this is an area he has great interest in. He kept emphasizing he just wants to learn how cinemas are operated in the U.S. It's not just about the money."

But to pull off the deal, Wanda needed plenty of that: more than $3 billion in cash, including $500 million it has promised to invest in AMC in North America. Financing such a big deal in a tough credit environment, and with China's property market in a slump, was some feat. In the end, much of the cash came from China's big, state-controlled banks.

To ensure that the deal succeeds, Mr. Wang said he would keep AMC's management in place with long-term pay incentives, and invest heavily in renovating older American theaters in an effort to bolster revenue.

Asked whether AMC would show films that the Chinese government found offensive, such as one dealing with the contentious issue of rebellions in Tibet, Mr. Wang said he would not interfere with decisions by his management team in the United States.

He also dismissed speculation in China that his ties to Bo Xilai, the fallen Politburo leader who also got his start in Dalian, could harm the Wanda Group.

"We knew each other, and were very familiar with one another," he said. "But it was just a working relationship. There was no personal relationship." He said the government had not asked to investigate the group.

Throughout the interview, Mr. Wang — who spoke calmly and quietly, and occasionally twirled his thumbs — said he was focusing on targets and executing strategies, fast.

Buying a Hollywood movie studio was not planned, he said, but he would not rule it out. Hotels and American shopping malls are more likely targets, he said.

"We don't have the strategy to go global in real estate," he said. "But for globalization and going out, we would like to buy hotels and hotel management companies. We also like department stores."

Zhang Wei contributed research from Beijing and Gu Huini from Shanghai.



​

Wanda is paying $2.6 billion for AMC Entertainment, including this theater in Los Angeles, to extend its reach globally. Credit Frederic J. Brown/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

万达帝国王健林:游刃于商业与权贵之间 Wang Jianlin, a Billionaire at the Intersection of Business and Power in China

2015年04月28日

万达帝国王健林:游刃于商业与权贵之间

傅才德

香港——他在全世界控制着成千上万的银幕,服务的电影观众比其他任何一家院线都多。他在四个大洲向房地产项目投入巨额资金。他正在修建的摩天大楼将会重绘伦敦和芝加哥的天际线。他也在计划收购一家好莱坞的电影制片厂。

在中国,身家过10亿美元的富豪多达430人,比美国以外的其他任何国家都多。但是王健林与众不同,原因不仅在于他是亚洲最富有的人,他的财富据估算超过350亿美元。

随着他的房地产和娱乐帝国向海外延伸,现年60岁的王健林凭借他在全球许多产业和社区的影响力,也成了中国私营部门并不多见的一位有能力在海外推进官方利益的大亨。

总理曾向他发函致谢,好莱坞最大的明星会听他的召唤,来到中国。今年3月,在一场吸引外国投资者的活动上,他是十几位与奥巴马总统晤面的商人中的一个。

父亲是毛泽东麾下参加共产主义革命的马前卒,儿子却一跃成为全球的顶级精英,这是中国向资本主义转型的过程中一个极为典型的故事。这场转变向 有才能或者有关系的人提供了极大机遇,而王健林可以说是既有才能,又有关系。不过,他的故事也是独一无二的:在一个所有土地都归政府所有的国家里,他建起 了全世界最有价值的房地产资产组合之一。

关于他的成就,《纽约时报》开展了长达一年的调查。调查揭示了在中国经济的顶峰,商业和权力鲜为人知地交汇在一起。在那里,共产党领导人的一时兴起,就能左右市场竞争的格局。

在过去超过30年的时间里,企业家推动了中国飞速的经济增长。然而在中国,即使是最成功的商人,也仍然需要与党达成某种合作——仅仅在一代人以前,党还在掌控着一个社会主义的计划经济社会。

王健林表示,他之所以能发迹,是因为向雄心勃勃的党内官员提供了他们想要的东西:作为样板工程的房地产开发项目。这些项目既能推动经济发展,又能推动官员的事业。他说,作为回报,官员则愿意以优惠价格把关键地块的开发权卖给王健林,远低于竞争对手需要支付的价钱。

他的企业集团万达,在中国最为著名的项目是标志性的万达广场。这些宏大的购物广场项目里,有影院、写字楼、宾馆和公寓。自从2002年在东北 城市长春兴建第一座万达广场以来,他已经在中国另外70座城市修建了超过100座。这些项目产生的收益如今为他向海外扩张的雄心提供了资金支持。

然而王健林与政府的关系当中,有一个方面他从未在采访中提及,在中国国内和国外对他成功故事的叙述中,这方面也从没有得到报道:中国最有权势的一些政治人物的亲属,以及他们的商业伙伴,在万达集团持有相当部分的股份。

通过仔细查阅公司向政府机关提交的文件,时报发现在2007年至2011年之间,有过数宗这样的投资。那时万达还未上市,极少向外界出售股份。

早期获得机会买到该公司股份的人当中,有一位是齐桥桥。她是一位活跃的投资者,也是中国现任国家主席习近平的姐姐。(2013年10月,她已经将持有的万达股份出售或转让给了一位长期的商业伙伴。)

通过查阅文件记录,采访家庭成员和商业伙伴,时报得知其他的早期投资者包括前总理温家宝女儿的一个商业伙伴,以及时任政治局委员贾庆林和王兆国的亲属。

去年12月,当王健林名下负责房地产业务的大连万达商业地产股份有限公司在香港首次公开发行时,他们在该地产公司的股份总价值11亿美元。而 在王健林负责电影业务的子公司今年1月单独上市时,他们在该电影院线所持股份价值1720万美元。目前,他们在两家公司持有的股份总价值逾15亿美元。

没有迹象表明,在亲属及生意伙伴拥有万达股份的相关政界人物中,有任何人代表该公司干预了与政府进行的任何交易。也没有证据表明,前述政界人 物中有任何人自身从这些投资者的巨额利润中获利。这些投资者以及政府官员或是没有回应书面提出的采访问题,或是无法联系到本人进行置评。

王健林拒绝了采访请求,也未回复提交给万达及代表万达的公关公司的书面问题。但在公开发言中,他经常用同一句话来描述自己是如何处理与当局的关系的:"亲近政府、远离政治。"

"实际上,就说中国经济是政府主导型经济,而且房地产又是一个审批型为主的行业,"王健林今年2月接受官方电视台的采访时说。"所以你要说这个行业我不理政府,完全做不到,我觉得完全就是一种虚话和假话。……但是同时,比方说,[我们]不行贿。"

商海弄潮 一帆风顺

2012年9月,一位不同寻常的演讲者让哈佛大学(Harvard)肯尼迪政府学院(John F. Kennedy School of Government)的学生着了迷。他个头不高,言辞直率,两眼间距不大,发际线呈明显的V字型。

"在中国尤其是民营企业能成功做大太不容易了,"他通过翻译说,"比美国企业家要艰辛好多倍。" 

如果教职人员这么说,就算不上什么不同凡响的洞见。但那天下午的演讲人是王健林,而且尽管存在他所说的困难,他依然在连战连捷。

在发表演讲的几个月前,王健林收购了美国第二大连锁院线AMC娱乐控股(AMC Entertainment Holdings)。到当年年底,他在中国境内的帝国就包括了66座万达广场、38家五星级酒店、980块银幕和57家百货商场,更别说还有63家卡拉 OK店。在接下来的一年时间里,他在海边城市青岛开工建设了一座投资80亿美元的影视制作和主题产业园,莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥(Leonardo DiCaprio)、妮可·基德曼(Nicole Kidman)、约翰·特拉沃塔(John Travolta)等明星纷纷飞去庆祝。

伴随着成功而来的,是超级富豪标志性的一掷千金。王健林出资2820万美元拍得一幅毕加索(Picasso)的画作。他妻子结交的是摩纳哥的阿尔伯特亲王(Prince Albert)。他儿子雇了韩国的一个顶级流行音乐组合在自己的27岁生日聚会上表演。

不满于仅仅拥有一艘游艇的王健林,收购了一家英国公司。在詹姆斯·邦德(James Bond)系列电影中出现的豪华游艇就是由该公司建造的。今年1月,王健林的公司宣布将购买西班牙某足球俱乐部的部分股份。

"他有一股超人的力量,"与王健林认识超过三年的梦工厂动画电影公司(DreamWorks Animation)首席执行官杰弗里·卡岑伯格(Jeffrey Katzenberg)说。"他的个性非常非常强,对自己在做的事情极度自信。"

王健林的父亲是一名老战士,参加过共产党具有传奇色彩的长征。共产党上世纪30年代那次穿越中国的跋涉充满艰辛,途中伤亡惨重,磨练了一代革 命者。在五兄弟中排行老大的王健林自己,则在十几岁时便效仿父亲参了军。2013年亮相官方电视台时,王健林回忆说,在毛泽东那场狂热的文化大革命期间, 他曾在训练时在及膝深的雪地里走了2000多华里。

"很多人都是,都坚持不下来,"王健林说。但他坚持了下来。后来,在接下来的16年时间里,他在军队里层层晋升。同事称,这一经历让他形成了自己的管理风格。比如,前员工称,在他手下,就连级别最高的万达高管也被要求上下班打卡,迟到是不能容忍的。

退役后,王健林在东北的港口城市大连找到了一份政府工作。当1988年被调到一个日渐衰败的国有住宅楼开发公司时,他的机会来了。在一名老战友的帮助下,他得到了一笔贷款,并让公司扭亏为盈。

1992年,公司重组,成为中国首批股份制公司之一。在接下来的10年,王健林领导该公司实现私有化,并成为其大股东。

那个时期的大部分阶段,大连的市长一直是薄熙来。后来,父亲是党内一名颇具影响的元老的薄熙来升任政治局委员,并在2012年因为一场令人震惊的腐败和谋杀丑闻而下台。

在薄熙来任内,王健林为大连做出了巨大贡献。他买下了该市的足球队,并帮助该队成了全国冠军。王健林还捐出巨资修建学校。

自薄熙来下台后,王健林一直试图撇开与他的关系。前不久接受采访时,王健林称,因为拒绝行贿,且又和薄熙来关系不好,他在那些年里处境艰难。他说,这限制了他拿地,因为薄熙来领导的政府不卖给他。

 "我们还是赚到钱了,但那段时间不好过,"王健林对《彭博市场》(Bloomberg Markets) 杂志表示。

在中国,所有土地的正式所有权都归国家;因此,想在土地上兴建设施的人必须得到国家的同意。多年来,地方政府一直依靠出售长期的土地开发权,为自己的运作提供资金。但谁以什么价位拿到哪些地块,既是经济决策,也是政治决策。

王健林表示,他的公司总是能为有万达的项目的城市带去利益,以至于地方政府现在争相与其建立业务关系,而他要拒绝超过三分之二的提议。

"我们就占据了主动,就具有议价权,"他对哈佛大学的学生说。他接着表示,那就意味着他获得土地的成本,比竞争对手至少便宜一半。

大连万达的招股说明书显示,在中国的房价不断创下新高的同时,该公司购买土地的价格在2011年到2014年期间却下降了逾40%。

中国商业地产联盟副会长王永平说,地方官员都迫切希望与万达合作,一是因为万达的项目为他们带来的税收,另一个原因是万达有雷厉风行的美誉 。能够在18个月内建成一座万达广场,这被称之为"万达速度"。

"中国政府喜欢出政绩,"王永平说。"18个月可能决定他是不是能当区长或省委书记。"

不过,有些掌权者支持王健林却另有原因。

书面记录中的通向权贵之路

2007年7月时,王健林手中还只有几座建成的万达广场。他的资产尚未达到10亿美元,在中国之外几乎没人听说过他或他的公司。在追踪中国富豪净值的胡润百富榜(Hurun Rich List)上,王健林排名第148位。

然而,公司记录显示,那个月末,在北京新成立的一家公司——铭豪控股——获得了王健林名下的旗舰公司万达集团的2.5%的股份,成为最大的外部股东。当时除了铭豪控股之外,万达集团只有一家外部股东,那是王健林的友人在大连经营的一家房地产公司。

这些记录显示,接着,两个月之后,另一家在北京新成立的公司——五谷丰投资咨询公司——获得了大连合兴投资有限公司1.53%的股份,成为万达的第五个股东。王健林是通过持有大连合兴投资的股份来持有他在万达集团的股份的。

这些文件没有显示为何这两家北京的公司会被邀请成为王健林生意的早期投资者。但这两家公司的记录指向了当时中共中央政治局的两名成员的亲属。 这两名政治局委员是多年担任北京市委书记、在中共领导层中排名第四的贾庆林,以及曾经带头支持一项保护私有财产的标志性法律的全国人大高级官员王兆国。 

这些记录显示,王兆国的儿子王新宇是第一家公司的控股股东,该公司后来把万达股权转让给了一个名叫杨欣的年轻女子。据王兆国的堂兄弟王兆安说,杨女士是王兆国的外甥女。王兆安在这个家族的河北老家担任村党委书记 。

记录中显示,第二家公司的所有者名叫潘永斌,63岁,他的公司地址、员工和电话号码与贾庆林的女婿李伯潭在北京经营的一家投资公司相同。潘永斌还是李伯潭拥有的多家公司的董事,包括其名下的主要的投资公司。

随着万达在此后几年的繁荣发展,这些早期投资的价值飙升。

根据万达提交给政府的文件,王兆国之子控制的公司用不到50万美元购买了万达的股份, 不过该公司自己的记录中没有显示这笔交易。这些文件中关于第二家公司的信息更加全面,显示那家公司为万达的股权支付了约20万美元。这两笔股权目前的价值 已分别超过6.4亿美元和2.5亿美元。

这两名政治局委员都没有权力直接为万达购买的土地设定价格,也无权直接批准向万达出售土地使用权的交易。但两人所管辖的中共机构帮助王健林获得了极大的社会认知度。

2008年3月,王健林成了中国人民政治协商会议的三位大陆亿万富豪委员之一,这个国家级的议政机构由贾庆林领导,其成员均是中共领导层眼中 有影响力的人物。一名加入了类似机构的中国商人说,有了这一头衔,相当于得到了中共高层领导人的认可 。为了保护自己的地位,这名商人要求不具名。

2007年6月,王健林还被一个中共管控的行业协会评为杰出企业家,此后四年,他又四次获得由王兆国领导或与他有关的组织所颁发的奖项。

这类荣誉向地方官员和潜在的商业伙伴传递的信息是,荣誉的获得者有很深的背景。"至少在中国境内,人们会更愿意和你做生意,而且冒犯你的可能 性也大大降低," 加州大学圣迭戈分校(University of California, San Diego)的学者史宗瀚(Victor Shih)说。

在2008年末全球金融危机爆发之后,中国的房地产市场急转直下。在2008年一年里,上海的房地产类股票暴跌了65%。

不过,万达集团在这一年的表现令人印象深刻,七座新的万达广场破土动工——创下了有史以来的最高记录——使王健林在胡润百富榜上升至第20位,其财富据估算为23亿美元。

接下来的一年,万达再次向外部股东派发股份, 私下出售了公司8.5%的股权。

万达的八名新投资者中包括一家北京公司,该公司由习近平的姐姐齐桥桥以及她的丈夫邓家贵通过一个控股公司网络所持有。

齐桥桥和习近平都是 "太子党",即一个由中共高级领导人的后代组成的权贵团体的成员。他们已故的父亲习仲勋是毛泽东的战友,曾任副总理,后来成为了中国经济改革的先锋人物。

齐桥桥曾在政府和军队担任过多个职位,此后才成为一名商人。在那段时期,她的弟弟习近平正努力在地方政府中向上攀升。

目前尚不知道齐桥桥和丈夫为何会得到投资万达的机会。2009年时,她已经是一名财力雄厚的投资者,在全国各地都有商业往来。与此同时,她的弟弟则已经成为中国国家副主席,并被外界一致认为将成为中共的下一任领导人。

齐桥桥和邓家贵没有答复时报的置评请求。但记录显示,夫妻二人在2012年开始,退出数以亿计美元的投资,当时习近平开始高调打击官员腐败。抛售行动背后的动机目前还不清楚,但当她弟弟的活动把矛头对准了成千上万的官员时,抛售动作降低了他在政治上受到冲击的可能性。

夫妻二人在出售资产时,许多买家和他们之间都没有明确的联系。

但是二人在万达持有的股份2013年10月8日转让给了一个长期商业伙伴,当时他们股份的估值达2.4亿美元,2009年二人买入时的价格是2860万美元。记录没有显示该名商业伙伴买入的价格,但此人曾与齐桥桥和邓家贵在不同的企业岗位上合作超过10年。

万达的另一个新股东,是由清华控股部分持有并管理的一家投资基金。清华控股是北京名校清华大学的投资机构,当时它的主要负责人是胡海峰,时任国家主席胡锦涛之子。没有迹象显示胡海峰曾得益于万达的股份,也没有迹象表明他本人持有任何万达股份。

一些人获得了早期投资万达的机会,但他们的身份很难确定。其中之一是金怡,她在2009年获得了现在价值约2.5亿美元的股份。但她身份证上的地址并不完整,而且在该社区官方的居民记录中,也并没有她的名字。

然而,公司记录显示,金怡是温如春的商业伙伴。温如春别名常丽丽(Lily Chang),是2003年到2013年在任的前总理温家宝的女儿。在北京一家房地产公司的三名合伙人当中,金怡和常丽丽均名列其中。

推动中国文化

去年在瑞士达沃斯,这个聚集了富人和有权势者的年度盛会上,王健林在小组讨论中坐在高盛(Goldman Sachs)首席执行官劳尔德·贝兰克梵(Lloyd Blankfein)和英国副首相尼克·克莱格(Nick Clegg)之间,几乎没有发言。但是,当一个发言者表示,中国关注于领土争端,削弱了在亚洲的影响力时,这位亿万富翁发怒了。

"今天本来是一个经济论坛,不应该涉及政治,"王健林厉声说,"你公开地挤兑中国,我觉得起码不太礼貌。"

随着王健林的财富日益增多,以及其投资在海外延伸,他已经开始直白地倡导中国的利益。在采访和演讲中,他倾向于把自己描绘成中国大企业中务实的代表人物,向担心中国崛起的外国听众传递充满机会的讯息,试图让他们感到安心。

"从党的角度来看,王健林是个完美的工具,"哈佛大学教授约瑟夫·奈(Joseph Nye)说。奈曾提出了"软实力"这个说法,在王健林发言斥责的那场小组讨论中,奈也出席了。

王健林之所以是一个有效的工具,部分原因在于他已经不再单纯是一个房地产开发商了。随着最近几年北京试图让中国房地产市场降温,他开展多元化 举措,向国外转移投资,并进入了文化娱乐行业;比如他的院线在2012年购买了AMC公司位于美国的4000多块银幕之后,成为了全球最大的连锁影城。

万达采取这种战略之时,恰逢中国领导层努力在国内和国外拓展中国文化的影响力。中国的年轻一代越来越多地转向了西方的音乐、电视和电影。

中共中央委员会在2011年10月发表的一份决定中提到,"增强国家文化软实力、中华文化国际影响力"的要求"更加紧迫"。

"这个纲领性文件之后",万达"就大力发展文化产业",北京的清华-卡内基全球政策中心学者张丽华表示。

一些与中共高层领导人有联系的投资者,得以在早期参与万达的行动。记录显示,2010年12月,贾庆林女婿的投资公司收购了万达旗下连锁影城价值900万美元的股份,截至周一,这些股份已经升值到1.31亿美元。

记录显示,同月还有另一笔早期投资,投资方是私募股权公司新天域资本(New Horizon)管理的一家投资基金。新天域是温家宝的儿子温云松(Winston Wen)联合创办的。这些股权目前价值为5.26亿美元。

中央委员会的决定催生的新政策,令万达这样的房地产企业受益。

比如,地方政府被告知,要把土地使用权优先出让给一些开展中华文化促进项目的企业,国有银行被告知,要提供贷款推动国内外的文化事业。中国进出口银行则同意为万达的海外投资项目提供融资,支持其收购AMC。

除了投资电影产业之外,万达还开办了一系列宣传中国文化的游乐园,其中一个乐园中有一栋建筑,形状如同中式茶壶。王健林说,该乐园要和正在建设中的上海迪士尼乐园开展竞争。

"迪斯尼再好毕竟是美国文化,"他去年在奠基仪式后说。"我们希望用中国文化。"

宾夕法尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)研究该公司的学者韩煦表示,万达的海外扩张部分上是北京推动的,因为北京希望看到中国首屈一指的企业能在海外立足。但他表示,该公司更感兴趣的是赚取利润,而不是直接影响外界对中国的意见。

"中央政府的目标是非常明确的,"他说。"拥有一家非常成功的中国公司,这对中国有好处。"

王健林收购AMC时,他保留了美国的管理团队,并强调他的公司不会去决定美国的影院上映哪些电影。

但是由于预计中国到2018年票房收入将超过北美地区,好莱坞已经把注意力投向了中国影迷和审查者,审查者可以决定哪些外国电影可以在中国的影院上映。

王健林经常指出,到2023年,中国市场规模将达到北美市场的两倍。

2013年,王健林邀请迪卡普里奥和基德曼,参加其青岛影视基地的开工仪式。当时他警告说,外国人需要注意上述的新现实。

"世界电影人士谁更早认识到这点,谁更早与中国合作,"他说,"谁就能更早受益。"

傅才德(Michael Forsythe)是《纽约时报》记者。

安思乔(Jonathan Ansfield)自北京和河北唐山石各庄、Julie Hirschfeld Davis自华盛顿协助报道,Kiki Zhao自北京参与研究。

April 28, 2015

Wang Jianlin, a Billionaire at the Intersection of Business and Power in China

By MICHAEL FORSYTHE

HONG KONG — He controls thousands of movie screens around the world, serving more filmgoers than any other cinema chain. He has invested billions of dollars in real estate projects across four continents. He is building skyscrapers that will redraw the skylines of London and Chicago. He is shopping for a Hollywood studio.

There are as many as 430 billionaires in China, more than in any country besides the United States. But Wang Jianlin stands out, and not just because he is the richest person in Asia, with a fortune estimated at more than $35 billion.

As his real estate and entertainment empire expands overseas, Mr. Wang, 60, has emerged as the rare private-sector tycoon in a position to advance Beijing's interests abroad, with clout in industries and communities around the world.

Prime ministers send him thank-you notes, and Hollywood's biggest stars fly to China when he summons them. In March, at an event to woo foreign investors, he was one of only a dozen businessmen to meet President Obama.

How the son of a foot soldier in Mao Zedong's Communist Revolution catapulted into the top tier of the global elite is an archetypal story of China's transition to capitalism and the outsize opportunities it presents those with talent or connections — or, in Mr. Wang's case, both. His story, though, is also singular: He built one of the world's most valuable real estate portfolios in a nation where the state retains ownership of all land.

A yearlong examination of his success by The New York Times casts a light on the murky intersection of business and power at the heights of the Chinese economy, where market competition is often warped by the whims of Communist Party leaders.

Entrepreneurs have powered rapid growth in China for more than three decades. But even the most successful businessmen here must still reach some accommodation with the party, which only a generation ago operated a socialist planned economy.

Mr. Wang says he has prospered by delivering what ambitious party officials crave: showcase real estate developments that propel economic growth and bolster their careers. In return, he says, the officials sell him the rights to develop choice parcels of land at prices far below what his competitors pay.

His conglomerate, Wanda Group, is best known in China for its signature Wanda Plazas, massive shopping complexes with cinemas, office towers, hotels and apartments. Since building the first one in the northeastern city of Changchun in 2002, he has opened more than 100 of them in at least 70 other Chinese cities, generating the revenue that now finances his ambitions abroad.

But there is an aspect of his relationship with the authorities that Mr. Wang never raises in interviews and that has gone unreported in the many accounts of his success published in China and abroad: Relatives of some of the nation's most powerful politicians and their business associates own significant stakes in his company.

An extensive review of corporate records filed with the government identified several such investments made from 2007 to 2011, when Wanda was privately held and rarely sold shares to outsiders.

Among those given an early chance to buy a stake in his company was Qi Qiaoqiao, an active investor who is the elder sister of China's current president, Xi Jinping. (She sold or transferred her shares in the company in October 2013 to a longtime business associate.)

Other early investors included a business partner of the daughter of former Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, and relatives of two other members of the ruling Politburo at the time, Jia Qinglin and Wang Zhaoguo, according to the records and interviews with family members and business associates.

Together, their stakes in Wang Jianlin's real estate division, Dalian Wanda Commercial Properties, were valued at $1.1 billion when it held an initial public offering in Hong Kong in December. Their shares in Mr. Wang's cinema subsidiary were valued at $17.2 million when it listed separately in January. Their holdings in both companies are worth more than $1.5 billion now.

There is no indication that any of the politicians whose relatives and business associates owned shares in Wanda intervened on the company's behalf in any of its dealings with the government. Nor is there evidence that any of the politicians personally benefited from the windfall that these investors reaped. The investors and officials did not respond to written questions or could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Wang declined an interview request and did not respond to written questions submitted to Wanda. But in public remarks, he often uses the same phrase to describe how he manages his relationship with the authorities: "Stay close to the government and distant from politics."

"It's a fact that China's economy is government-led, and the real estate industry depends on approvals, so if you say you can ignore the government in this business, I'd say that's impossible," Mr. Wang told state television in a February interview. "I'd say it's hypocritical and fake to say that. … But at the same time, for example, we don't pay bribes."

A Remarkable Winning Streak

It was Harvard in September 2012, and students at the John F. Kennedy School of Government were spellbound by an unusual lecturer, a short, plain-talking man with close-set eyes and a prominent widow's peak.

"In China, it's not easy for a company, especially a private company, to be successful and grow," he said through an interpreter. "The hardships they face are many times greater than in the United States."

It would not have been a particularly incisive observation from a member of the faculty. But the speaker that afternoon was Wang Jianlin, and despite the hardships that he described, he was on a remarkable winning streak.

Months earlier, Mr. Wang had purchased AMC Entertainment Holdings, the second-largest theater chain in the United States. By year's end, his empire in China would include 66 Wanda Plazas, 38 five-star hotels, 980 cinema screens and 57 department stores, not to mention 63 karaoke saloons. Within a year, he would break ground on an $8 billion movie studio and theme park in the coastal city of Qingdao, flying in stars such as Leonardo DiCaprio, Nicole Kidman and John Travolta to celebrate.

With success came the familiar trappings of the megarich. Mr. Wang bought a Picasso painting at auction for $28.2 million. His wife socialized with Prince Albert of Monaco. His son hired a top Korean pop group to perform at his 27th birthday party.

Not content with just owning a yacht, Mr. Wang bought the British company that makes the luxury boats seen in James Bond films. In January, his company announced it was buying a stake in a Spanish soccer club.

"He is a force of nature," said Jeffrey Katzenberg, the chief executive of DreamWorks Animation, who has known Mr. Wang for more than three years. "He is a very, very strong personality, and he is extremely confident about what he is doing."

Mr. Wang's father was a veteran of the Communist Party's Long March, the arduous and deadly trek across China in the 1930s by the Communists that hardened a generation of revolutionaries, and Mr. Wang himself, the eldest of five brothers, followed him into the army as a teenager. In a 2013 appearance on state television, he recalled marching hundreds of miles through knee-deep snow in training exercises during Mao's fanatical Cultural Revolution.

"Many people couldn't make it," Mr. Wang said, but he did. He then spent the next 16 years rising through the officer ranks, an experience that colleagues say informs his management style. Even his most senior Wanda executives are required to punch in and out, for example, and tardiness is not tolerated, former employees say.

After leaving the military, Mr. Wang took a government job in the northeastern port city of Dalian. His big break there came in 1988, when he was transferred to a failing state-owned builder of residential apartment blocks. By his own account, he secured a loan with the help of an old army buddy and returned the company to profitability.

In 1992, the firm was restructured as one of China's first shareholding companies, and over the next decade, Mr. Wang oversaw its privatization, emerging as its majority owner.

The mayor of Dalian for much of that time was Bo Xilai, a politician who was the son of an influential party elder and who would rise to the Politburo before falling from power in a stunning corruption and murder scandal in 2012.

Mr. Wang was an extraordinary benefactor to Dalian during Mr. Bo's tenure, buying the city's soccer team, which helped make it a national champion, and donating tens of millions of dollars to build schools.

Since Mr. Bo's fall, Mr. Wang has sought to distance himself from him. In a recent interview, he said he struggled during those years because he refused to pay bribes and did not get along with Mr. Bo. That limited his access to land, he said, which Mr. Bo's administration would not sell him.

"We still made money, but it wasn't a pleasant time," Mr. Wang told Bloomberg Markets magazine.

Because the state retains formal ownership of all land in China, those who want to build on it must have the state's blessing. Local governments have depended for years on the sale of long-term rights to develop land to finance their operations. But who gets which parcels, and at what price, is as much a political decision as an economic one.

Mr. Wang says his company is so good at delivering benefits to the cities where it builds that local governments now compete for his business and he turns down more than two out of every three proposals.

"We thus can take the initiative, and we have the bargaining power," he told the students at Harvard. That means he acquires land at less than half the cost to his competitors, he added.

Even as property prices set records in China, the price that Dalian Wanda paid for access to land fell by more than 40 percent from 2011 to 2014, according to its I.P.O. prospectus.

Wang Yongping, vice chairman of the China Commercial Real Estate Association, said local officials were eager to work with Wanda because of the tax revenue its projects bring them and because it has a reputation for getting things done fast. The company can finish a Wanda Plaza at what it calls Wanda Speed, or within 18 months.

"Chinese government officials love to have achievements when they are in office," Wang Yongping said. "Eighteen months might determine whether they can become a district chief or a provincial party secretary."

But some in power have other reasons to root for Wang Jianlin.

A Paper Trail to the Elite

In July 2007, Mr. Wang had built only a handful of Wanda Plazas. He had yet to make his first billion dollars, and few outside China had heard of him or his company. The Hurun Rich List, which tracks the net worth of the wealthiest people in China, ranked him 148th.

But late that month, a newly formed firm in Beijing, Minghao Holdings, acquired a 2.5 percent stake in Mr. Wang's flagship company, Wanda Group, becoming its largest external shareholder, according to corporate records. There was only one other outside shareholder at the time, a local real estate company in Dalian run by a friend.

Then, two months later, another newly established firm in Beijing, Wugufeng Investment Consulting, took a 1.53 percent stake in the main company that Mr. Wang used to hold his shares in Wanda Group, becoming its fifth shareholder, the records show.

The documents do not indicate why the two Beijing firms were invited to become early investors in Mr. Wang's business. But the paper trail from the companies leads to relatives of two men sitting at the time on the Communist Party's ruling Politburo: Jia Qinglin, a longtime party boss of the Beijing municipality who ranked fourth in the party leadership, and Wang Zhaoguo, a senior legislator who was the leading force behind a landmark law providing legal protections for private property.

Wang Zhaoguo's son, Wang Xinyu, was the controlling shareholder of the first firm, which later transferred its stake in Wanda to a young woman named Yang Xin, the records show. Ms. Yang is the Politburo member's niece, according to Wang Zhao'an, a cousin who serves as party chief in the family's home village in Hebei Province.

The owner of the second firm is listed in the records as Pan Yongbin, 63, who shares a business address, staff and phone numbers with a Beijing investment firm run by Mr. Jia's son-in-law, Li Botan. Mr. Pan is also listed as a board member of several firms owned by Mr. Li, including his main investment company.

As Wanda prospered in the years that followed, the value of these early stakes skyrocketed.

The firm controlled by Wang Zhaoguo's son paid less than $500,000 for its stake, according to Wanda's filings with the government, though the firm's own records do not show the transaction. The documents are more complete for the second firm, showing a payment of less than $200,000 for its stake. Those two stakes are now worth more than $640 million and $250 million.

Neither Politburo member was in a position to directly set the price or approve the sale of land-use rights to Wanda. But party institutions under the two men have showered Wang Jianlin with public recognition.

In March 2008, Mr. Wang was one of only three mainland billionaires named to the standing committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Congress, a national advisory body, led by Mr. Jia, that is made up of people whom the party leadership deems influential. The appointment amounted to a seal of approval by top party leaders, said one Chinese businessman who serves on a similar body and spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect his position.

In June 2007, Mr. Wang was also named an outstanding private entrepreneur by a party-run industry association, the first of five awards bestowed upon him over the next four years from groups led by or associated with Wang Zhaoguo.

Honors like these can signal to local officials and potential business partners that their recipients are well connected. "At least within China, people will be much more willing to do business with you, and much less likely to offend you," said Victor Shih, a scholar at the University of California, San Diego.

After the global financial crisis in late 2008, China's property market took a nose dive. Real estate stocks in Shanghai ended the year down 65 percent.

But Wanda had a banner year, breaking ground on seven new Wanda Plaza complexes — setting a record — and propelling Wang Jianlin to 20th on the Hurun list of China's richest people, with a fortune estimated at $2.3 billion.

The next year, Wanda distributed shares to outsiders again, privately selling an 8.5 percent stake in the company.

Among the eight new investors was a Beijing firm owned through a network of holding companies by Qi Qiaoqiao, the sister of Xi Jinping, and her husband, Deng Jiagui.

Ms. Qi and Mr. Xi are members of a privileged elite consisting of the offspring of senior party officials. Their now deceased father, Xi Zhongxun, was a military comrade of Mao and later became a vice premier and a pioneer of economic reform.

Ms. Qi worked in a variety of political and military posts during her career before becoming a businesswoman. During that time, her younger brother, Mr. Xi, was working his way up through the ranks in provincial government posts.

It is not known why Ms. Qi and her husband were offered the chance to invest in Wanda. By 2009, she was already a wealthy investor with business relationships across the country. Meanwhile, her brother had become China's vice president and was the consensus candidate to become the party's next leader.

Ms. Qi and Mr. Deng did not respond to a request for comment. But records show the couple began selling off or transferring hundreds of millions of dollars in investments in 2012 as President Xi embarked on a high-profile crackdown on official corruption. The motivation behind this sell-off is unclear but it had the effect of reducing her brother's political vulnerability as his campaign targeted thousands of officials.

In many cases, the couple sold their investments to individuals with no clear connection to them.

But the shares in Wanda — valued at $240 million now, up from the $28.6 million the couple paid for them in 2009 — were transferred to a longtime business associate on Oct. 8, 2013. The records give no indication of the price paid by the business associate, who has served the couple in various corporate posts for more than a decade.

Another new shareholder in Wanda was an investment fund owned in part and managed by a subsidiary of Tsinghua Holdings, the investment arm of Beijing's prestigious Tsinghua University. At the time, the top official at Tsinghua Holdings was Hu Haifeng, the son of Hu Jintao, then China's president. There is no indication Hu Haifeng personally benefited from or held any shares in Wanda himself.

Some of the individuals given an early chance to invest in Wanda are difficult to identify. One of them, Jin Yi, acquired a stake in 2009 that is now worth about $250 million. But the address on her identity card is incomplete, and her name is not included on the official registry of residents in the neighborhood listed.

Corporate records indicate, however, that Ms. Jin is a business associate of Wen Ruchun, the daughter of Wen Jiabao, the prime minister from 2003 to 2013. Ms. Jin is listed as one of three partners in a Beijing real estate firm alongside Lily Chang, an alias used by Ms. Wen.

Promoting Chinese Culture

Seated between Lloyd Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, and Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister of Britain, Wang Jianlin had little to say through much of a panel discussion last year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the annual gathering of the wealthy and powerful. But when a speaker suggested that China's focus on territorial disputes diminished its influence in Asia, the billionaire bristled.

"This is a discussion on economics today and shouldn't delve into politics," Mr. Wang snapped. "You are publicly saying bad things about China — at the very least, I don't think this is very polite."

As his fortune has climbed and his investments have stretched overseas, Mr. Wang has emerged as an outspoken advocate for his homeland. In interviews and speeches, he tends to present himself as the pragmatic face of big business in China, delivering a soothing message of opportunity to foreign audiences anxious about the country's rise.

"Wang Jianlin is a perfect instrument for that from the party's point of view," said Joseph Nye, the Harvard professor who coined the term "soft power" and was the panelist scolded by Mr. Wang at Davos.

Mr. Wang is effective in part because he is no longer simply a Chinese real estate developer. As Beijing sought to cool its property sector in recent years, he diversified by shifting investments abroad and into the culture and entertainment sector, including his network of movie theaters, which became the world's largest in 2012 with the purchase of AMC's 4,000-plus screens in the United States.

The strategy coincided with a policy push by the Chinese leadership to expand the nation's cultural influence both overseas and at home, where younger generations have increasingly turned to Western music, television and films.

A communiqué issued by the party's Central Committee in October 2011 cited an "urgency for China to strengthen its cultural soft power and global cultural influence."

"After this document, Wanda started to put a lot of effort into developing the cultural industry," said Zhang Lihua, a scholar at the Tsinghua-Carnegie Center for Global Policy in Beijing.

Investors connected to senior party leaders were able to get in early on Wanda's move. In December 2010, the investment firm of Mr. Jia's son-in-law acquired a $9 million stake in Wanda's cinema subsidiary, records show. As of Monday, the stake was worth $131 million.

The records also show another early investment that same month by an investment fund run by New Horizon, a private equity firm co-founded by Mr. Wen's son, Winston Wen. On Monday, that stake was valued at $526 million.

The Central Committee's decision resulted in new policies that benefited real estate companies such as Wanda.

Local governments, for example, were told to prioritize the sale of land-use rights to companies that built projects that promote Chinese culture. And state-owned banks were told to offer loans for cultural undertakings at home and abroad. The state export-import bank agreed to help finance Wanda's overseas investments, backing its acquisition of AMC.

In addition to investing in the movie industry, Wanda has opened a series of amusement parks that promote Chinese culture, including one that features a building in the shape of a Chinese teapot and that Mr. Wang says will compete with a Disneyland under construction in Shanghai.

"No matter how good Disney is, it is still American culture," he said after the groundbreaking ceremony last year. "We hope to use Chinese culture."

Xu Han, a scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who has studied the company, said Wanda's overseas expansion was driven in part by Beijing's desire to see the nation's premier companies build a presence abroad. But he said the firm was more interested in profit than in directly influencing public opinion about China.

"The central government's objective is very clear," he said. "To have a very successful Chinese company is good for China."

When Mr. Wang bought AMC, he retained the American management team and emphasized that his company would not dictate what films were shown in American theaters.

But with China forecast to surpass North America in box office revenue by 2018, Hollywood is already focused on serving Chinese filmgoers and satisfying the censors who determine what foreign films can be shown in Chinese theaters.

Mr. Wang often notes that the Chinese market will be twice the size of the North American market by 2023.

Foreigners need to heed this new reality, he warned when he hosted Mr. DiCaprio and Ms. Kidman for the 2013 groundbreaking of his Qingdao studio.

"Those in the world film industry who realize this first and are among the first to cooperate with China," he said, "will be the first to reap the benefits."

Jonathan Ansfield contributed reporting from Beijing and Shigezhuang, Hebei. Julie Hirschfeld Davis contributed reporting from Washington. Kiki Zhao contributed research from Beijing.

相关文章

Influential Stakeholders

Relatives of some of China's most powerful politicians and their business associates have acquired millions of shares of Dalian Wanda Commercial Properties and Wanda Cinema Line, both companies controlled by Wang Jianlin, Asia's richest person.


​

Wang Jianlin, a Billionaire at the Intersection of Business and Power in China - NYTimes.com


HONG KONG — He controls thousands of movie screens around the world, serving more filmgoers than any other cinema chain. He has invested billions of dollars in real estate projects across four continents. He is building skyscrapers that will redraw the skylines of London and Chicago. He is shopping for a Hollywood studio.

There are as many as 430 billionaires in China, more than in any country besides the United States. But Wang Jianlin stands out, and not just because he is the richest person in Asia, with a fortune estimated at more than $35 billion.

As his real estate and entertainment empire expands overseas, Mr. Wang, 60, has emerged as the rare private-sector tycoon in a position to advance Beijing's interests abroad, with clout in industries and communities around the world.

Prime ministers send him thank-you notes, and Hollywood's biggest stars fly to China when he summons them. In March, at an event to woo foreign investors, he was one of only a dozen businessmen to meet President Obama.

How the son of a foot soldier in Mao Zedong's Communist Revolution catapulted into the top tier of the global elite is an archetypal story of China's transition to capitalism and the outsize opportunities it presents those with talent or connections — or, in Mr. Wang's case, both. His story, though, is also singular: He built one of the world's most valuable real estate portfolios in a nation where the state retains ownership of all land.

A yearlong examination of his success by The New York Times casts a light on the murky intersection of business and power at the heights of the Chinese economy, where market competition is often warped by the whims of Communist Party leaders.

Entrepreneurs have powered rapid growth in China for more than three decades. But even the most successful businessmen here must still reach some accommodation with the party, which only a generation ago operated a socialist planned economy.

Mr. Wang says he has prospered by delivering what ambitious party officials crave: choice real estate developments that propel economic growth and bolster their careers. In return, he says, the officials sell him the rights to develop choice parcels of land at prices far below what his competitors pay.

His conglomerate, Wanda Group, is best known in China for its signature Wanda Plazas, massive shopping complexes with cinemas, office towers, hotels and apartments. Since building the first one in the northeastern city of Changchun in 2002, he has opened more than 100 of them in at least 70 other Chinese cities, generating the revenue that now finances his ambitions abroad.

But there is an aspect of his relationship with the authorities that Mr. Wang never raises in interviews and that has gone unreported in the many accounts of his success published in China and abroad: Relatives of some of the nation's most powerful politicians and their business associates own significant stakes in his company.

An extensive review of corporate records filed with the government identified several such investments made from 2007 to 2011, when Wanda was privately held and rarely sold shares to outsiders.

Among those given an early chance to buy a stake in his company was Qi Qiaoqiao, an active investor who is the elder sister of China's current president, Xi Jinping. (She sold or transferred her shares in the company in October 2013 to a longtime business associate.)

Other early investors included a business partner of the daughter of former Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, and relatives of two other members of the ruling Politburo at the time, Jia Qinglin and Wang Zhaoguo, according to the records and interviews with family members and business associates.

Together, their stakes in Wang Jianlin's real estate division, Dalian Wanda Commercial Properties, were valued at $1.1 billion when it held an initial public offering in Hong Kong in December. Their shares in Mr. Wang's cinema subsidiary were valued at $17.2 million when it listed separately in January. Their holdings in both companies are worth more than $1.5 billion now.

There is no indication that any of the politicians whose relatives and business associates owned shares in Wanda intervened on the company's behalf in any of its dealings with the government. Nor is there evidence that any of the politicians personally benefited from the windfall that these investors reaped. The investors and officials did not respond to written questions or could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Wang declined an interview request and did not respond to written questions submitted to Wanda. But in public remarks, he often uses the same phrase to describe how he manages his relationship with the authorities: "Stay close to the government and distant from politics."

"It's a fact that China's economy is government-led, and the real estate industry depends on approvals, so if you say you can ignore the government in this business, I'd say that's impossible," Mr. Wang told state television in a February interview. "I'd say it's hypocritical and fake to say that. ... But at the same time, for example, we don't pay bribes."

A Remarkable Winning Streak

It was September 2012, and students at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard were spellbound by an unusual lecturer, a short, plain-talking man with close-set eyes and a prominent widow's peak.

"In China, it's not easy for a company, especially a private company, to be successful and grow," he said through an interpreter. "The hardships they face are many times greater than in the United States."

It would not have been a particularly incisive observation from a member of the faculty. But the speaker that afternoon was Mr. Wang, and despite the hardships that he described, he was on a remarkable winning streak.

Months earlier, Mr. Wang had purchased AMC Entertainment Holdings, the second-largest theater chain in the United States. By year's end, his empire in China would include 66 Wanda Plazas, 38 five-star hotels, 980 cinema screens and 57 department stores, not to mention 63 karaoke saloons. Within a year, he would break ground on an $8 billion movie studio and theme park in the coastal city of Qingdao, flying in stars such as Leonardo DiCaprio, Nicole Kidman and John Travolta to celebrate.

With success came the familiar trappings of the megarich. Mr. Wang bought a Picasso painting at auction for $28.2 million. His wife socialized with Prince Albert of Monaco. His son hired a top Korean pop group to perform at his 27th birthday party.

Advertisement

Not content with just owning a yacht, Mr. Wang bought the British company that makes the luxury boats seen in James Bond films. In January, his company announced it was buying a stake in a Spanish soccer club.

"He is a force of nature," said Jeffrey Katzenberg, the chief executive of DreamWorks Animation, who has known Mr. Wang for three years. "He is a very, very strong personality, and he is extremely confident about what he is doing."

Mr. Wang's father was a veteran of the Communist Party's Long March, the arduous and deadly trek across China in the 1930s by the Communists that hardened a generation of revolutionaries, and Mr. Wang himself, the eldest of five brothers, followed him into the army as a teenager. In a 2013 appearance on state television, he recalled marching hundreds of miles through knee-deep snow in training exercises during Mao's fanatical Cultural Revolution.

"Many people couldn't make it," Mr. Wang said, but he did. He then spent the next 16 years rising through the officer ranks, an experience that colleagues say informs his management style. Even his most senior Wanda executives are required to punch in and out, for example, and tardiness is not tolerated, former employees say.

After leaving the military, Mr. Wang took a government job in the northeastern port city of Dalian. His big break there came in 1988, when he was transferred to a failing state-owned builder of residential apartment blocks. By his own account, he secured a loan with the help of an old army buddy and returned the company to profitability.

In 1992, the firm was restructured as one of China's first shareholding companies, and over the next decade, Mr. Wang oversaw its privatization, emerging as its majority owner.

The mayor of Dalian for much of that time was Bo Xilai, a politician who was the son of an influential party elder and who would rise to the Politburo before falling from power in a stunning corruption and murder scandal in 2012.

Mr. Wang was an extraordinary benefactor to Dalian during Mr. Bo's tenure, buying the city's soccer team, which helped make it a national champion, and donating tens of millions of dollars to build schools.

Since Mr. Bo's fall, Mr. Wang has sought to distance himself from him. In a recent interview, he said he struggled during those years because he refused to pay bribes and did not get along with Mr. Bo. That limited his access to land, he said, which Mr. Bo's administration would not sell him.

"We still made money, but it wasn't a pleasant time," Mr. Wang told Bloomberg Markets magazine.

Because the state retains formal ownership of all land in China, those who want to build on it must have the state's blessing. Local governments have depended for years on the sale of long-term rights to develop land to finance their operations. But who gets which parcels, and at what price, is as much a political decision as an economic one.

Photo Mr. Wang has emerged as the rare private-sector tycoon in a position to advance Beijing's interests abroad, with international clout. Credit Adam Dean for The New York Times

Mr. Wang says his company is so good at delivering benefits to the cities where it builds that local governments now compete for his business and he turns down more than two out of every three proposals.

"We thus can take the initiative, and we have the bargaining power," he told the students at Harvard. That means he acquires land at less than half the cost to his competitors, he added.

Even as property prices set records in China, the price that Dalian Wanda paid for access to land fell by more than 40 percent from 2011 to 2014, according to its I.P.O. prospectus.

Wang Yongping, vice chairman of the China Commercial Real Estate Association, said local officials were eager to work with Wanda because of the tax revenue its projects bring them and because it has a reputation for getting things done fast. The company can finish a Wanda Plaza at what it calls Wanda Speed, or within 18 months.

"Chinese government officials love to have achievements when they are in office," Wang Yongping said. "Eighteen months might determine whether they can become a district chief or a provincial party secretary."

But some in power have other reasons to root for Wang Jianlin.

A Paper Trail to the Elite

In July 2007, Mr. Wang had built only a handful of Wanda Plazas. He had yet to make his first billion dollars, and few outside China had heard of him or his company. The Hurun Rich List, which tracks the net worth of the wealthiest people in China, ranked him 148th.

But late that month, a newly formed firm in Beijing, Minghao Holdings, acquired a 2.5 percent stake in Mr. Wang's flagship company, Wanda Group, becoming its largest external shareholder, according to corporate records. There was only one other outside shareholder at the time, a local real estate company in Dalian run by a friend.

Then, two months later, another newly established firm in Beijing, Wugufeng Investment Consulting, took a 1.53 percent stake in the main company that Mr. Wang used to hold his shares in Wanda Group, becoming its fifth shareholder, the records show.

The documents do not indicate why the two Beijing firms were invited to become early investors in Mr. Wang's business. But the paper trail from the companies leads to relatives of two men sitting at the time on the Communist Party's ruling Politburo: Jia Qinglin, a longtime party boss of the Beijing municipality who ranked fourth in the party leadership, and Wang Zhaoguo, a senior legislator who was the leading force behind a landmark law providing legal protections for private property.

Wang Zhaoguo's son, Wang Xinyu, was the controlling shareholder of the first firm, which later transferred its stake in Wanda to a young woman named Yang Xin, the records show. Ms. Yang is the Politburo member's niece, according to Wang Zhao'an, a cousin who serves as party chief in the family's home village in Hebei Province.

The owner of the second firm is listed in the records as Pan Yongbin, 63, who shares a business address, staff and phone numbers with a Beijing investment firm run by Mr. Jia's son-in-law, Li Botan. Mr. Pan is also listed as a board member of several firms owned by Mr. Li, including his main investment company.

As Wanda prospered in the years that followed, the value of these early stakes skyrocketed.

The firm controlled by Wang Zhaoguo's son paid less than $500,000 for its stake, according to Wanda's filings with the government, though the firm's own records do not show the transaction. The documents are more complete for the second firm, showing a payment of less than $200,000 for its stake. Those two stakes are now worth more than $640 million and $250 million.

Neither Politburo member was in a position to directly set the price or approve the sale of land-use rights to Wanda. But party institutions under the two men have showered Wang Jianlin with public recognition.

In March 2008, Mr. Wang was one of only three mainland billionaires named to the standing committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Congress, a national advisory body, led by Mr. Jia, that is made up of people whom the party leadership deems influential. The appointment amounted to a seal of approval by top party leaders, said one Chinese businessman who serves on a similar body and spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect his position.

In June 2007, Mr. Wang was also named an outstanding private entrepreneur by a party-run industry association, the first of five awards bestowed upon him over the next four years from groups led by or associated with Wang Zhaoguo.

Honors like these can signal to local officials and potential business partners that their recipients are well connected. "At least within China, people will be much more willing to do business with you, and much less likely to offend you," said Victor Shih, a scholar at the University of California, San Diego.

After the global financial crisis in late 2008, China's property market took a nose dive. Real estate stocks in Shanghai ended the year down 65 percent.

But Wanda had a banner year, breaking ground on seven new Wanda Plaza complexes — setting a record — and propelling Wang Jianlin to 20th on the Hurun list of China's richest people, with a fortune estimated at $2.3 billion.

The next year, Wanda distributed shares to outsiders again, privately selling an 8.5 percent stake in the company.

Among the eight new investors was a Beijing firm owned through a network of holding companies by Qi Qiaoqiao, the sister of Xi Jinping, and her husband, Deng Jiagui.

Ms. Qi and Mr. Xi are members of a privileged elite consisting of the offspring of senior party officials. Their now deceased father, Xi Zhongxun, was a military comrade of Mao and later became a vice premier and a pioneer of economic reform.

Ms. Qi worked in a variety of political and military posts during her career before becoming a businesswoman. During that time, her younger brother, Mr. Xi, was working his way up through the ranks in provincial government posts.

It is not known why Ms. Qi and her husband were offered the chance to invest in Wanda. By 2009, she was already a wealthy investor with business relationships across the country. Meanwhile, her brother had become China's vice president and was the consensus candidate to become the party's next leader.

Photo When Mr. Wang broke ground on an $8 billion movie studio and theme park in the coastal city of Qingdao in 2013, the stars he flew in to celebrate included Leonardo DiCaprio. Credit Jason Lee/Reuters

Ms. Qi and Mr. Deng did not respond to a request for comment. But records show the couple began selling off or transferring hundreds of millions of dollars in investments in 2012 as President Xi embarked on a high-profile crackdown on official corruption. The motivation behind this sell-off is unclear but it had the effect of reducing her brother's political vulnerability as his campaign targeted thousands of officials.

In many cases, the couple sold their investments to individuals with no clear connection to them.

But the shares in Wanda — valued at $240 million now, up from the $28.6 million the couple paid for them in 2009 — were transferred to a longtime business associate on Oct. 8, 2013. The records give no indication of the price paid by the business associate, who has served the couple in various corporate posts for more than a decade.

Another new shareholder in Wanda was an investment fund owned in part and managed by a subsidiary of Tsinghua Holdings, the investment arm of Beijing's prestigious Tsinghua University. At the time, the top official at Tsinghua Holdings was Hu Haifeng, the son of Hu Jintao, then China's president. There is no indication Hu Haifeng personally benefited from or held any shares in Wanda himself.

Some of the individuals given an early chance to invest in Wanda are difficult to identify. One of them, Jin Yi, acquired a stake in 2009 that is now worth about $250 million. But the address on her identity card is incomplete, and her name is not included on the official registry of residents in the neighborhood listed.

Corporate records indicate, however, that Ms. Jin is a business associate of Wen Ruchun, the daughter of Wen Jiabao, the prime minister from 2003 to 2013. Ms. Jin is listed as one of three partners in a Beijing real estate firm alongside Lily Chang, an alias used by Ms. Wen.

Promoting Chinese Culture

Seated between Lloyd Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, and Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister of Britain, Wang Jianlin had little to say through much of a panel discussion last year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the annual gathering of the wealthy and powerful. But when a speaker suggested that China's focus on territorial disputes diminished its influence in Asia, the billionaire bristled.

"This is a discussion on economics today and shouldn't delve into politics," Mr. Wang snapped. "You are publicly saying bad things about China — at the very least, I don't think this is very polite."

As his fortune has climbed and his investments have stretched overseas, Mr. Wang has emerged as an outspoken advocate for his homeland. In interviews and speeches, he tends to present himself as the pragmatic face of big business in China, delivering a soothing message of opportunity to foreign audiences anxious about the country's rise.

"Wang Jianlin is a perfect instrument for that from the party's point of view," said Joseph Nye, the Harvard professor who coined the term "soft power" and was the panelist scolded by Mr. Wang at Davos.

Mr. Wang is effective in part because he is no longer simply a Chinese real estate developer. As Beijing sought to cool its property sector in recent years, he diversified by shifting investments abroad and into the culture and entertainment sector, including his network of movie theaters, which became the world's largest in 2012 with the purchase of AMC's 4,000-plus screens in the United States.

The strategy coincided with a policy push by the Chinese leadership to expand the nation's cultural influence both overseas and at home, where younger generations have increasingly turned to Western music, television and films.

A communiqué issued by the party's Central Committee in October 2011 cited an "urgency for China to strengthen its cultural soft power and global cultural influence."

"After this document, Wanda started to put a lot of effort into developing the cultural industry," said Zhang Lihua, a scholar at the Tsinghua-Carnegie Center for Global Policy in Beijing.

Investors connected to senior party leaders were able to get in early on Wanda's move. In December 2010, the investment firm of Mr. Jia's son-in-law acquired a $9 million stake in Wanda's cinema subsidiary, records show. As of Monday, the stake was worth $131 million.

The records also show another early investment that same month by an investment fund run by New Horizon, a private equity firm co-founded by Mr. Wen's son, Winston Wen. On Monday, that stake was valued at $526 million.

The Central Committee's decision resulted in new policies that benefited real estate companies such as Wanda.

Local governments, for example, were told to prioritize the sale of land-use rights to companies that built projects that promote Chinese culture. And state-owned banks were told to offer loans for cultural undertakings at home and abroad. The state export-import bank agreed to help finance Wanda's overseas investments, backing its acquisition of AMC.

In addition to investing in the movie industry, Wanda has opened a series of amusement parks that promote Chinese culture, including one that features a building in the shape of a Chinese teapot. Mr. Wang says it will compete with a Disneyland under construction in Shanghai.

"No matter how good Disney is, it is still American culture," he said after the groundbreaking ceremony last year. "We hope to use Chinese culture."

Xu Han, a scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who has studied the company, said Wanda's overseas expansion was driven in part by Beijing's desire to see the nation's premier companies build a presence abroad. But he said the firm was more interested in profit than in directly influencing public opinion about China.

"The central government's objective is very clear," he said. "To have a very successful Chinese company is good for China."

When Mr. Wang bought AMC, he retained the American management team and emphasized that his company would not dictate what films were shown in American theaters.

But with China forecast to surpass North America in box office revenue by 2018, Hollywood is already focused on serving Chinese filmgoers and satisfying the censors who determine what foreign films can be shown in Chinese theaters.

Mr. Wang often notes that the Chinese market will be twice the size of the North American market by 2023.

Foreigners need to heed this new reality, he warned when he hosted Mr. DiCaprio and Ms. Kidman for the 2013 groundbreaking of his Qingdao studio.

"Those in the world film industry who realize this first and are among the first to cooperate with China," he said, "will be the first to reap the benefits."

Jonathan Ansfield contributed reporting from Beijing and Shigezhuang, Hebei. Julie Hirschfeld Davis contributed reporting from Washington. Kiki Zhao contributed research from Beijing.

A version of this article appears in print on April 29, 2015, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Billionaire at the Intersection of China's Business and Power.